Take this job and shove it.

Layton, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle




Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels:

Pay your damn people Hillary

Layton, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

I always thought I would support Hillary in the general but this just pisses me off to no end.



My mom owns a cleaning business and hearing the guy that owned that cleaning business talk about getting the run around from the Hillary campaign cuts deep, real deep...too deep. I have had to do collections for my mom and it is no fun. This is down right disgraceful and pathetic.

Right now I feel like if Hillary wins the nomination I won't be lifting a finger for her and I might not even vote, I will stay home, got that Hillary, pay your damn people.

Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels:

Erick Erickson can kiss my ass

Layton, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

The following is the reason that progressives are so much more organized on the internet according to Erick Erickson, a Republican blogger.

Erick Erickson... conceded that progressives currently enjoy an advantage over conservatives online—though he attributed it to an asymmetry in free time, since conservatives "have families because we don't abort our kids, and we have jobs because we believe in capitalism."


Here is a screen shot of my time card this week.



My wife worked similar hours this week, so between the two of us we have worked 100+ hours this week but this is what it takes to live comfortably in America. Republicans want to talk about the strain on the family, there it is but I digress.

Erick Erickson is the same idiot that runs a half baked Republican blog that is suppose to be the rights version of daily kos. He whined that the liberals that run daily kos wouldn't show him how to setup a load balancing server cluster so his site kept crashing. How is it that liberals can figure this stuff out? It must be because we are all lazy and don't have jobs...right or is it because our knuckles don't drag on the ground...either way Erick Erickson can kiss my ass.

ht - Zablanc

Lazy Liberal Blogger
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: ,

Homeless Veterans

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle



I am thinking about giving my tax "stimulus" to a homeless veterans charity. Wonder what O'Reilly is doing with his?



Of course the only media person on the case is Olbermann.



Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , ,

Faux Noise caught using the same "focus group" to pump McCain.

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle



You will see the same people three months ago in this video at around 3:46.



And again yesterday in this video at around 1:44.



Creating the news since the mid 90s...that is Faux Noise

Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , ,

Operation change for the better

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle



Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , ,

Video - John McCain's Mom Loses Him The Mormon Vote - YW

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

"Mom, all you had to do was sit there and look old so I looked young. But no. You couldn't do that, could you. You couldn't just say the others weren't as experienced as I was.. You had to go and friggin' piss off the whole Mormon population. You know, this is why I had to go into counseling, Ma."

"Oh shut up, ya pansy. Those Mormons up there are corrupt and everyone knows it."

"Damnit, Ma."

"Watch yer mouth!"





DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , ,

The "Your Side Sucks Too" Defense

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

In the comment section of the last post, Political Spy Glass had this to say:
Do you really think the Democrats are any different. The liberal left whack jobs that now control the DCCC shows that polarization goes both ways.
Jason The broadened the question a bit for me by separating the base from the leadership:
This difference is the Republican BASE is polarized (i.e. there is no longer a republican base)

That's why we'll be winning the elections, while the Republicans flounder like 13 year olds going through a puberty induced identity crisis.

The most interesting thing about this is PolySpy's argument is that it had nothing to do with my post. I hear it frequently though. A Republican or a Democrat is blasted for something they've done, and the strange defense of "Well, your side is just as bad" springs up. It's an interesting phenomenon to assume that criticism of a Republican makes you a die-hard Democrat, or vice-versa.

I have no hesitance criticizing Democrats.

This particular comment caught me at a strange time, actually. At the moment, I'm furious with the Democrats. If they did nothing else, I would have been thrilled they were voted into office if they would have restored some of the checks and balances of the Constitution, and affirmed the supremacy of the Constitution over the tenuous assertions by Executive that its powers were limitless during this, their interminable "war on terror." A few things I've seen them do have given me hope. More things have demoralized me greatly.

Their confirmation of Michael Mukasey as Attorney General wreaks of political cowardice and failure of duty. In Attorney General Mukasey we had a man - a sitting judge for over a decade - who refused to make a moral judgment on whether water boarding was torture, and openly contended the President wielded plenary power on a "battlefield" which he claimed may very well cover the entire earth. After all we've been through, rejecting this nominee should have been a no-brainer.

Before the last break, they expanded Executive authority while eliminating any meaningful oversight. Now they're making noises that they will cave in and provide retroactive immunity for telecommunication giants who violated the law.

Oh, and they'd also like to turn the justice department into an enforcement arm of intellectual property holders, suing file-sharers, seizing property, and turning over proceeds to members of the RIAA, MPAA and other such organizations. Which is good, because, you know it's not like the DoJ has anything else to do.

There are good ones on both sides of the aisle. The rest? Let's throw them all out.

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Experiment with Short Post explaining Republican Slime

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

I think I write too much sometimes. I look at other blogs, and they often consist of just two or three paragraphs, so here's a shot:

-----------------------

Ever wonder why you see all of these Republican candidates like John McCain, Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani, (all front-runners) who used to be at least quasi-respected moderates, abandon all principle and integrity to flip-flop in whatever direction their hateful, radically religious conservative base demands them to.

The Republican Leadership doomed the credibility of their party when they, along with neoconservatives and PNAC loyalists deliberately fused Christianity and Political ideology in order to secure a rabid, unflinching base which they could build into a blank check and blind eye while these people pursued their radical agendas.

They succeeded, but now they find themselves left with a polarized religious base where uncontested, incontrovertible proof is summarily dismissed by bizarre, simplistic rationalizations if the proof it inconvenient to their religiously-entangled political beliefs.

There. That's all I'm going to write. And let me tell you. It's hard. But I'm trying.

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Attempting to Attach Ron Paul's Integrity to the Smoldering Remains of "Republican Credibility"

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

I found some random blog which had a whole slew of bizarre posts to respond to. The first one I read concerned Ron Paul. "Ron Paul Fights for Liberty-oriented Republican Party" From the article:
"Ron Paul is one angry Republican. Get him started on America's skyrocketing debt, illegal immigration, secret wiretapping or border security and he wags his finger, his voice rising as the words come out in furious bursts."
Well, all of those things make me angry, but whenever I've seen Ron Paul, he seems like a well-tempered, reasonable, articulate man. He seems like a statesman. In fact, it is the rest of that sad Republican crew of Presidential hopefuls who consistently stink of mock outrage and righteous indignation and "Look at how war-hungry a Jesus-Loving, Uzi-Packing Bad Ass I am???".
Ron Paul likes to make one thing perfectly clear: he is a Republican.
He does? You'd think him showing up at the Republican debates would have cleared that up. And frankly, outside of the Republican debates, where they're all trying to out-crazy each other to appeal to their chicken-killer religious-nut-job base, I don't see a whole lot of Republicans wearing their Republicanism proudly at all.
Yes, he abandoned the Republican Party and ran as the Presidential Candidate of the Libertarian Party twenty years ago in 1988, but who hasn't had a few youthful transgressions? He quickly saw the folly of 3rd party politics and returned to the party nurtured by the spirit of Ronald Reagan and Thomas Jefferson.
No subject is seemingly unrelated enough that a Republican can't somehow invoke the exploited corpse of former President Ronald Reagan. *suppresses gag reflex*

Folly? No, there is no folly in 3rd party politics. There is a travesty in regards to 3rd party politics, as we are reminded of the death-grip the two party system has on us all.
Of course Ron Paul is an angry Republican. The Republican Party hasn't left him. The Republican Party has turned left ... and Ron Paul doesn't like it.
*sigh* There it is. One more Republican who is literally incapable of accepting responsibility for the failings of their party. The Republicans didn't turn left, they turned corrupt. It has never been a Democratic principle to endow the Executive with plenary, unchecked, interminable "wartime" powers. It has never been a Democratic principle to suspend Habeas Corpus in direct and obvious violation of clearly state language in the Constitution of the United States of America. Is has not been a principle of Democrats to established massive programs approving warrantless domestic surveillance, including who knows what else. Under the last Democratic administration, we lowered the national debt and established a surplus.

I encourage you to go read the whole, awful, thing and then review the questions I would ask the author:
Dear Republican in Denial,

Have you considered the possibility that Republican corruption, betrayal of the Constitution and astounding incompetence in managing civil and military affairs is their failure alone?

The elaborate acrobatics weaving dubious, barely plausible explanations which blame others for their mistakes are increasingly nauseating, pathetic, and ineffective.

Republicans still seem utterly incapable of taking responsibility for their moral failures and shocking incompetence, both home and abroad. They, and their die-hard supporters, still - still cannot help but instinctively point the finger at the Democrats, the secularists, immigrants and of course, the favorite and most often used Republican bogyman, the mythical "liberal media." Booga booga!

When I saw Ron Paul in the Republican debates, he struck me by his honesty, sincerity, and integrity.

It was these things which separated him from the other Republican candidates, and sadly, most of the Democratic candidates as well.

You think it's good for the Republicans that people are registering Republican to vote for Ron Paul?

Unless you think they're all inexplicably straight-party-ticket-voting types, who will stay loyal to the Republican party even without Ron Paul on the ticket, I wouldn't bank on it. Ron Paul is an anomaly within the Republican party, not a representative attraction.

In fact, the people who registered Republican to vote for Ron Paul will likely further induce the confusion, resentment and disarray which is already infecting the base of the Republican party.

People like Ron Paul invoke enthusiasm and loyalty because he is a man of integrity, not because he is a Republican. In fact, he enjoys support despite his association with the Republican party.

During the last seven years, the Republican "brand" has been sullied by the ceaseless parade of scandal and corruption wreaking of hypocrisy and astonishing deceit. Throw in their general incompetence and being Republican isn't something too many are proud of these days.

Ironically, it is his integrity which virtually ensures he will not be chosen as the candidate of the Republican party.

Until Republicans truly return to the principles they once claimed, and elect politicians with the integrity to sustain them, they will continue to rely upon deceit and other slanderous propaganda for their political victories.

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Overstock.com CEO Byrne Thinks Utahns are Idiots for Rejecting Vouchers

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

Caught this little gem on TV last night. Strangely, as much as I've read about Byrne, I can't recall seeing him on video. In any event, I took an instant disliking to him, and had to suppress my gag reflex when he chortled and quoted Beowulf:
"Yes, we are with overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne, Uh, Patrick, you've put your money where your mouth was in this campaign - two million bucks worth - umm - how are you feeling tonight?"

*crowd cheers*

"*laughs* Well, *chortles* you know, the..*laughs again* there's a line in Beowulf that goes, 'Fate often saves the undoomed warrior if his courage endures.' This fight ain't over. There's a couple of percent in, there's the vouch.. er.. the absentee ballot; the fights not over, I'm very anxious to see how the night turns out."

Alright, I suppose that's all fine and good. Maybe he's just one of those pompous, psuedo-intellectual asses. You know, the kind that thinks quoting an ancient text on a 30-second news spot will really reach out to potential voters and rally the troops at HQ. But the next exchange was much more interesting:
"Win or lose, do you feel like you've accomplished something, do you think you've sent a message."

"Not enough, actually. I think that this is basically a state-wide IQ test, and I'm very interested to see whether Utah passes or fails the IQ test."

"And you're not done with the fight then.."

*Chortles* "No, no this is just the beginning."

Well, as of almost midnight, it looks like 67% of us morons are rejecting vouchers and thus failing the all-knowing Byrne's IQ test. At least he can take comfort in knowing that at least 33% of us aren't total idiots, and I'm sure he'll find some comfort in the band of sycophants which have elevated him to minor deity status.

Did I pass? Sadly, no. But at least I exist within the same hellish ignorance and stupidity that so many of my fellow citizens must struggle to function within.





In closing, My Byrne's: You're a condescending schmuck and I'm glad you lost. However, in an attempt to meet you half way, here's a final passage from the much more enjoyable book "Grendel," a contemporary retelling of Beowulf from the perspective of the monster. My ode to you, sir:
"A little poetic, I would readily admit. His manner of speaking was infecting me, making me pompous. "Nevertheless," I whispered crossly-..but I couldn't go on, to conscious all at once of my whispering, my eternal posturing, always transforming the world with words, changing nothing ..... Spinning a web of words, pale walls of dreams, between myself and all I see."

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Voting Day - It's Here

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

If you're unsure where you're registered to vote, go here for information on your polling location and your ballot. Just for the record, this thing will not recognize you if your address is even one character off, so if doesn't recognize you once or twice, keep trying a few different combinations.

Happy Voting! I hope you're making an informed decision. The two big ones for me are, of course, Vouchers and SLC Mayor. I will be voting against Referendum Number 1 and the spineless, lying cowards who have been running their ads painting us local residents who support stronger schools instead of fractured, religious, indoctrination centers as "east coast liberal unions trying to make parental decisions for Utah children. Being born and raised a Utahn, without ever belonging to a union, I take a little offense at that.

Considering their egregious lack of integrity when campaigning for their position and the inescapable conclusions of what vouchers will wind up costing us (to you who insist it will save us money, grow the hell up. We'll spend millions of dollars defending it on multiple Constitutional fronts. And to the rest of you who pretend like it's about parental choice: give me a break. This is about using taxpayer money to indoctrinate the less fortunate of our society into an ideologically corrupted, unholy pseudo-religious Christian/Republican voting block.

So I will be voting Against on Citizens' State Referendum Number 1.

In the race between Ralph Becker and Dave Buhler, I have wound up determined to support Ralph Becker. This wasn't really that hard, actually, particularly after I heard on NPR SL City Councilman VanTurner back Buhler with reasons which seemed to segue into an admission that he owed him political favors and Buhler had called them in.

I think that Becker will have the best luck in balancing what is sure to be increasing tension between the west and east side, and frankly, that is much more important than trying to bridge the gap between the Salt Lake Democrats and the Republicans in the rest of the state that throw tantrums that they don't have absolute control over a portion of the state, which frankly, has never quite managed to engender my sympathy. Ah well.

Finally, the fact that Buhler seems to be a buddy of the cable industry, as Part of the Plan pointed out, pretty much seals his fate to me.



Finally, on City Proposition Number 1, I will be voting FOR the issuance of special bonds to fund the acquisition of property and construction of facilities for police and firefighters. I do this somewhat grudgingly, with the nagging question always picking at me, asking myself "Where has all the money gone that this President has demanded our country mortgage our future for in the name of national defense. Where the hell did all the money go which was supposed to support our first responders? This bond is for just short of $200 million. In the next couple of years, we will be approaching a trillion dollars spent in Iraq in Afghanistan, a decent chunk of which we simply have not accounted for - and enough that it could have funded these facilities for every state in the union.

If you own property at about the 300k mark, you'll wind up paying somewhere around another $175 a year. And although no one is overly fond of taxes, and even though I find myself occasionally irritated or concerned by the actions of police, (particularly if I'm receiving a ticket,) I am always reminded that whenever I have called on the fire department or the police - and I have had to do both more than once - they were there. Give them what they need. Hell. Give them what they want.

That is a brief summary of my reasoning. I hope you find your own and participate in the Democratic process of our great Republic! Have a fantastic election day!

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , ,

Colbert makes a mockery of the political process? Uhh...

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

CNN is running a story on Stephen Colbert filing with the S.C. Democratic party for a mock run at the Presidency. This line caught my attention:
"Opponents such as Howe argue that Colbert makes a mockery of the political process."
Yes, because up until now, the political process has exemplified sincerity of purpose and fair play.

Excuse me while I throw up in my wastebasket. At least if Colbert participated in the debates we'd have a few laughs. Plus, people might just have some truly important revelations, such as seeing the absurdity of the system for what it is and lynching the parade of clowns which own it.

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , ,

Mukasey is thoroughly Bad and will Betray the Constitution

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

I have been watching the confirmation hearings for Attorney General-designate Michael Mukasey. CNN has an article entitled "Attorney general nominee pledges independence" which paints a rather rosy pictures of Mukasey. It's not rosy. Mukasey fails to meet key standards which we must demand in an Attorney General.

He was asked several times whether or not torture is illegal and whether or not he would stand for it.

It is illegal, and he wouldn't stand for it, he responded.

Are. You. Kidding. Me?

President Bush constantly answers this question (indignantly, I might add) saying we do not torture, as if he's offended that we would even question him. The problem is that he and his evil henchman Dick Cheney consider things like water boarding, which until this Presidency has never been considered to be anything but torture, to be merely an uncomfortable dunk in the water.

As long as it is subjective, he doesn't ever have to worry about being lampooned for "lying" or breaking the law. When something is that open to interpretation, it's worse than worthless. It's an active diversion.

Of course torture is wrong and illegal. But that is no longer a substantive question. Indeed, the Bush administration has rendered this seemingly straightforward question meaningless with its incessant campaign of propaganda and disinformation. So now, we must always read between the lines and assume our "leaders" are dealing in sophistry.

So what is the question? The question is "Here is a list of 'interrogation techniques.' Could you please mark the ones you consider to be torture with a big red ex?" It's a tragedy, but to my great sadness, that's where we are.

Otherwise, a year down the line it might be revealed that we are "aggressively interrogating" American citizens who have been indefinitely detained by cutting their ears off and sewing them back on, or burning cigarette lighters into their sides. Suddenly, these things aren't torture, they're just aggressive interrogation techniques and no one stands responsible - once again.

Another key question he was asked concerned the Presidents abilities to indefinitely detain private citizens. He enthusiastically agreed. It was pointed out that as a judge, he even ruled that President Bush could do this (even though his decision was overturned.) In summary, he stated that yes, the President can detain American citizens indefinitely without charge on the battlefield. The Senator was onto his next question, and it would be easy to miss what he muttered next..

"...although how the 'battlefield' is defined has not been settled."

Translation? In this ever-vague, interminable "War on Terror," the battlefield could be considered to cover America, Americans, and anything an American might do in any way, and consequently, the President can detain anyone, for any reason or no reason, forever, without question, without judicial review, without anything which resembles the protections afforded by the Constitution of the United States of America.

Welcome to the new era of Bush supremacy, where he's got a do-whatever-he-wants badge and you've got nothing not even the Constitutional protections you thought you did.

On these issues and many more, the Constitutionality didn't seem to play much of a role in his consideration of divisive issues. In fact, to my great sadness, his greatest concerns when it came to, for instance, Guantanamo, were not the indefinite detentions and allegations of torture, but rather how these things appeared to Americans and the world at large.

The guy who's been imprisoned without charge for 5 years will no doubt be relieved to hear that the real problem is a public relationships one.

He'll be confirmed. He'll be confirmed because this administration is filled with extraordinarily corrupt, power-mad, egomaniacal and frankly, evil men, and because the Democratic leadership is either too foolish, cowardly or corrupt to stop it.

Mukasey is a man with a thoroughly corrupted ideology who will not sustain the Constitution nor the balance of powers. Forget what you think you can assume about the honesty of these men and women and read between the lines.

He is a Bush nominee for a reason.

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Video - Olbermann - Fred Thompson Thinks Bloggers are "Fringe Element" (YW)

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

I hate it when I learn more about movie stars. Now whenever I see Fred Thompson on TV, I have to remember that despite is folksy charm, he's just one more spinning, lying, waffling Republican wingnut who is desperately dancing to whatever song he thinks the fringe right wants him to.

Anyway, I'm cleaning up the cellars, so this is another old one. In fact, this is old to the tune of about 4 months. Never got posted for some reason.





DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Listed on BlogShares

Last Liberal Blogs Next



Locations of visitors to this page