Bush Arrives, Speaks, Paper Fails to Report Complete Message

Deseret Morning News: Bush wows S.L. crowd

And that’s not a crowd to be easily wowed!

Actually, the article mentions the hometowns of a few members of the late-night sycophantic welcoming committee: Saratoga Springs, Layton, Draper … not so much a crowd from Salt Lake as a crowd in Salt Lake, one might deduce.

The article includes snippets from Bush’s brief address to his adoring followers. These are noted below, including statements not included in the report, but which we believe to be honest renditions of the President’s complete message.


"Our most important duty is to protect American people from further attack."

That’s why I decided to cut and run from Afghanistan and al Qaeda to create a breeding ground for more terrorists in Iraq and secure Iran’s position as the dominant player in the Middle East.

"We will defeat the terrorists abroad so we do not have to fight them at home,"

That means our home and their homes. See, it’s like I said about Osama bin Laden back when I was lying – er, I mean, trying – to shift our focus to Iraq: “I don’t know where he is. You know, I just don’t spend that much time on him.”

Earlier in the day, Bush prefaced the series of speeches he will be kicking off Thursday in Salt Lake:


The president told reporters Wednesday during an earlier stop in Little Rock,
Ark., that his speeches will be "about the future of this country, and they're
speeches to make it clear that if we retreat before the job is done, this nation
would become even more in jeopardy."

We learned that from Afghanistan. See, it’s kinda like lying: once you tell a lie, you find that it leads to more lies, and before you know it, you’re living in a world of complete fiction. That’s how Cuttin’ an’ runnin’ works. We cut and run from al Qaeda, and sooner or later, we’ll have to do the same in Iraq – just as soon as we come up with a catchy phrase that makes it sound like that’s not really what we’re doing. The plain fact is that the voters of this nation missed their chance to cut and run when it might have actually done some good: November 2004, when they could have cut and run from my administration.


"We have a duty in this country to defeat terrorists.”

And maybe we’ll get back to that someday, after were done fighting insurgents in Iraq.


“That's why we'll stay on the offense and bring them to justice before they hurt us,”

Because, as my opponent in the last election pointed out, fighting terrorism really is about using good intelligence and sound police work to capture these international criminals and “bring them to justice.”

“and that's why we'll work to spread liberty in order to spread the peace."

Of course, this means we will continue to scale back liberty here at home, so we can spread it around in other places. You see, there’s only so much liberty to go around, so Americans will have to continue making sacrifices in this respect. See, it’s kinda like Israel’s one slice of bread, and Iran is another. You spread some liberty here, and maybe some peace over there … and before you know it, the entire Middle East turns into a nice little liberty and peace sandwich. A lot of people ask me, what’s your strategy for peace in the Middle East? Well, I just told you!

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

Ted Stevens - A Short Videography

Ted Stevens on the Internet:





Ted Stevens: Who the @!#%@! is he?





Ted Stevens sporting and interesting tie and competing for prestigious title:





DS

Secret Hold - Sen. Ted Stevens Smoked Out


Some of you may have read about the blogosphere's hunt for an anonymous Senator who placed a secret hold on popular legislation that would allow citizens to "google" government finance information.

When it was disclosed a "secret hold" had been placed, the blogosphere went nuts. In an unholy alliance which threatened to destabilize time and space, bloggers from the right and left joined together to smoke out the offending Senator by organizing people to call each and every Senator to find out if they placed the hold. Over the last few days, the list shrunk until only 4 Senators remained. Imagine how proud I was when I learned two of the four Senators were from Utah.

From tpmmuckrakers.com:

"I called both my senators offices. Here is what I was told.

1) Senator Bennett is on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee unanimously passed the measure July 27th so while it is possible that he placed the secret hold at least at one point he supported the bill.

2) Senator Hatch's office said that Senator Hatch supports the bill however if he had placed the secret hold we wouldn't know because it is secret. They also said that they had received several calls including at least one from a newspaper that was calling every senator.

I read this as putting Bennett in the unlikely category and Hatch in the TBD category."

Before the most recent news, which I'll reveal presently, porkbusters showed the four mugshots of the suspects:


What a motley crew.

WHODUNNIT??

In any event, about an hour ago, a couple of outlets started reporting that the culprit was none other than $400-million-bridge-to-nowhere-can't-wait-to-drill-for-oil-internet-tubes Senator Ted Stevens, R-Alaska.


A spokesperson for Sen. Stevens acknowledged the Senator placed the hold, but insisted it was just because he was so darn magnanimous:

“Our reticence in getting out there is that Stevens doesn’t want to be in the media attacking Coburn,” Saunders said. “He has never addressed legislative concerns in the media. It is just not the way the senator has ever operated.”

What a thoughtful, swell guy.

A Senator anonymously places a secret hold on a bill intended to expose government pork. How's that for irony?

Hooray for the blogs on this one. This restored a tiny bit of faith in the will of the people to check their government.

DS

Warning: This Post Lacks Decorum!

A letter in today's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum:

Rocky, show some decorum
The last time President Bush was in Salt Lake City, the esteemed Mayor Rocky Anderson gave the president's motorcade the "bird," to the delight of his fellow protesters. I know this to be true, because several in the motorcade witnessed this vile act and reported it to me. Mayor Anderson claims he wants to increase the number of conventions coming to Salt Lake City, yet his disgusting behavior suggests he only wants members of conventions here who think and behave as he does. I would hope the citizens of Salt Lake will impress upon the mayor that he should represent them with more decorum and class.

Mike Dunn
Brigham City


Oh! Well, then! If several people said so, it must be true! Likewise, I have no reason to doubt it either, now that Mr. Dunn has “reported it to me!”

Even if it is true, so what? Is this as “vile” as telling a senator, on the Senate floor, "go fuck yourself?" Is it any less decorous than pointing out a reporter and calling him a “major league asshole” in front of an open microphone? Who among us is not prone to the occasional classless act in the heat of the moment?

Mike Dunn can kiss my liberal ass!

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

Politicizing "Junk" Science?

From today's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum:


Demos also trying to scare?
It was amusing to read Carrie Ulrich's opinion (Readers' Forum, Aug. 19) on how the GOP tries scaring voters by using national security issues. It is also funny watching the Democrats politicizing the junk science of global warming. They really do scare the heck out of a lot of people — probably just like Carrie. Quoting Franklin Roosevelt, she tells us there is nothing to fear but fear itself. It's too bad Franklin is not here today to join the rest of the democratic-sky-is-falling-party as they try to convince us there is nothing to fear but the planet cooking us slowly in a miserable death as we watch our loved ones and all our animal friends die in agony.
David Christensen
Taylorsville


For the Democrats – who, as a party, are not nearly as vocal on this issue as they should be – to “politicize” this issue like the Republicans do terrorism, these sorts of things would have to occur:

Every time a story broke casting a prominent Democrat in a bad light, party leaders would attempt to hijack the media’s focus by claiming, “We have recently obtained information indicating ocean levels may rise several inches in the near future, threatening major US cities. While the information is not specific as to time, place and depth, this may occur at any time.”

Every time good news for the Republican side of a debate emerged, Democrats would find a way to diminish it by reminding voters that we are in a life-and-death struggle against global warming, asserting that the danger is that, if Republicans are returned to office, the climate will go into a “cooling off period,” then hit us with another Hurricane Katrina.

Democrats would launch an initial campaign against greenhouse gas emissions. Then, just when we were about to gain the upper hand, they use "junk science" to lie us into shifting focus, energy and resources toward something completely unrelated, which would only make matters worse – just like Bush used junk intelligence to cut and run from al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

We can't let the smoking gun come in the form of a category 10 hurricane! You are either with us, or you support global warming! Why do you hate our scientists? The rising oceans hate us for our freedoms!

Please feel free to add your own retooling of a Republican catch-phrase in the comments section of this post!

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

This Week in Salt Lake Global Warming News and Opinion: 8/27/06

Deseret Morning News
The bad news: just three stories in the DMN this week. The good news: not a single outright ostrich farmer among them. One interesting, though unrelated comment from Saturday’s report:

"We recognize that this is the beginning of something important," Anderson told the Deseret Morning News.

Does this represent the end of Mayor Anderson’s so-called blacklisting of the DMN?

Back to the topic at hand ...

Monday
AP article notes that the 1989 “fix” for the deteriorating ozone layer exacerbates the problem of global warming. Note that this indicates a shotcoming in the science of response, rather than the science of cause (which is implicitly confirmed).

Saturday
Governor Huntsman creates advisory council on climate change: “There’s an issue here and we have to talk about it.”

Sunday
Washington Post columnist Mike Tidwell focuses on threat of rising sea level, intensifying hurricanes to Washington D.C.


Salt Lake Tribune
Like last week, the Trib brought us little news and much opinion this week, including a survey of local opinion (Saturday) and pair of dueling op-eds on a currently favored argument among ostrich farmers (Friday).

Monday
Dr. and Mrs. Edward Ames of Corvallis, OR applaud the Trib’s series on global warming … and without using the word “kudos!”

Tuesday
Tom Moyer of SLC differentiates between legitimate science and baseless propaganda in yet another retort to ostrich farmer Jim Elwell’s infamous letter.

Wednesday
Item 71 on Beloit College’s annual college freshman “Mindset List”: they’ve never known a time when the US was not studying global warming.

Thursday
Derrick Z. Jackson of the Boston Globe reports that cable TV’s The Weather Channel has decided to start taking GW seriously and helping to bring the science to the viewing public.

Friday
David Ridenour of the wingnut National Center for Public Policy Research thinks climate variation in the past undermines GW science in the present.

Wayne Madsen, contributing writer to the progressive Online Journal, exposes the presently fashionable argument from past climate variations for the ostrich farm fertilizer that it is.

Saturday
Tribune Poll: Utahns split equally on question of whether global warming is proven, in agreement on question of reducing energy consumption.

Sunday
New York Times best-sellers list: Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth tops the paperback nonfiction category.

Hyper-Religious Wacko of the Week: 8-26-06

Chocolate idol is inspiring viewers to re-examine faith
Deseret Morning News, Sunday 8-20-2006

Cruz Jacinto, a kitchen worker at Bodega Chocolates in Fountain Valley, CA, arrived at work one morning to find that a leaky vat had dripped chocolate into the figure of -- who else? -- the Virgin Mary!

I don't know. Seeing the photo, the first thing I thought of was The Maltese Falcon.

Maybe it's not God, but the spirit of Humphrey Bogart dwelling in this store. Either way, this "chocolate figurine" appears to be "the stuff that dreams are made of."

Congratulations Cruz Jacinto. While a good number of your coworkers seem equally ready to worship your tasty little icon, and "nearly 100 have flocked to see it," you discovered it, and you just happened to have a picture at the ready for comparison! You are this week's Hyper-Religious Wacko of the Week!

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Ostrich Farmer of the Week: 8-26-06

This week's award for those with their heads in the sand on the issue of global warming (and encouraging others to behave likewise) does not go to a specific individual. Instead, we recognize the 45% of Utahns who continue to live in willful denial on this issue, and the staggering 64% nationally who "Think scientists disagree about it."

Simply unbelievable. This farm is larger than previously feared.

Note: links to letters and articles published in the Salt Lake Tribune are generally only active during the week following publication. After seven days, these items are locked away in their pay-per-view archive.

Sofa King Redneck of the Week: 8-26-06

Well, we didn’t have to wait long for Utah State Senator Chris Buttars (R-West Jordan) to make our weekly list of dubious distinction. He just missed the cut last week's Hyper-Religious Wacko of the Week, owing to our need to know more about his effort to “define separation of church and state.” Monday, however, he stepped directly in a pile of his own BS during an interview on Logan's KVNU (610 AM).

Addressing Buttars’ current fixation on the issue of “judicial activism,” KVNU reporter Tom Grover cited the landmark 1955 Supreme Court decision Brown v Board of Education as a case in which so-called “judicial activism” overthrew abusive legislation. Buttars responded:


"Well, I think Brown v. Board of Education is wrong to begin with.”

His basis for such thinking? A complete misreading of a section from Jay P. Greene’s book, Education Myths.

Udpate: This letter appears in Sunday's DMN Readers' Forum:

Buttars misinterpreted book
I am the author of the book "Education Myths" that Sen. Chris Buttars cites as supporting his views on Brown v. Board of Education and the effects of desegregation. Nothing in my book could be interpreted as opposing the Brown decision or desegregation. In fact, the Brown decision only appears once in the book (on page 204) in a chapter about how school choice contributes to the desirable policy goal of improved school integration. My book clearly embraces the desegregation goals of the Brown decision. I'm afraid that the senator must have my book confused with a different one.
Jay P. Greene

head of the Department of Education Reform
University of Arkansas

We all know this much from the legislative proposals submitted by Sen. Chris Buttars during recent years: He doesn’t like gays, he doesn’t like atheists, and he doesn’t like scientists. Now he seems to have drawn exactly the opposite conclusion from the argument Greene presents in his book … as if he were reading with a pre-conceived conclusion in mind.

If jumping to a bigoted conclusion isn’t a defining attribute of redneckedness, I don’t know what is. Given his documented history of bigotry toward all sorts of people who act or think differently than him, Utah State Senator Chris Buttars receives this week’s Sofa King Redneck of the Week award.

Congratulations, Senator Buttars. I am sure, in time, this will prove to be the first in a long list of victories in our Weekly Awards of Dubious Distinction.

Note: links to letters and articles published in the Salt Lake Tribune are generally only active during the week following publication. After seven days, these items are locked away in their pay-per-view archive.

Wild-Eyed Fear Monger of the Week: 8-26-06

Only matter of time till (sic) terrorists get nuclear weapons
Deseret Morning News, Thursday 8/24/2006

In his column carried in Thursday’s DMN, Hoover Institute Fellow Tomas Sowell gives us this dire assessment of the future:

Nuclear weapons in the hands of Iran and North Korea mean that it is only a matter of time before there are nuclear weapons in the hands of international terrorist organizations. North Korea needs money and Iran has brazenly stated its aim as the destruction of Israel — and both its actions and its rhetoric suggest aims that extend even beyond a second Holocaust.

He is actually right on this point. Remember John Kerry’s response, during a 2004 presidential debate, when asked what he believed to be the single most serious threat to U.S. national security? Nuclear proliferation, including over 600 tons of nuclear material left unsecured by the demise of the Soviet Union.

This is a genuinely fear-worthy concern. The problem with Sowell’s view is in the ends toward which he mongers it. Similarly, he goes on to make a valid point concerning the underpinnings of jihadism:

Humiliation and hate go together. Why humiliation? Because a once-proud, dynamic culture in the forefront of world civilizations, and still carrying a message of its own superiority to "infidels" today, is painfully visible to the whole world as a poverty-stricken and backward region, lagging far behind in virtually every field of human endeavor.

Here again – although one might argue whether the entire “Islamic culture” promulgates “a message of its own superiority” any more than, say, American evangelicals do here at home – he hits close to the mark.

So, when does Sowell jump the tracks of reason and careen off into the intellectually impoverished land of the Neo-cons? Right here:

There is no way that they can catch up in a hundred years, even if the rest of the world stands still.

The film Syriana, based upon the book See No Evil, the memoir of former CIA operative Robert Baer, poignantly highlights the effects decades of U.S. policy has produced within the common citizenry throughout the Middle East. Propping up and supporting despotic regimes through covert intelligence operations and military intervention to enable corporate exploitation has created outrageously wealthy oligarchs while leaving hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of young Middle-Easterners impoverished, disenfranchised, disillusioned, and ripe for the message of the jihadists.

The answer is not more of the same, only more so! The answer requires sincere efforts to address the root of the problem! That means an entire overhaul of the way the Western world engages economically with the Middle Eastern regimes.

Sowell goes on to make the requisite association of the current situation with WWII:

Hitler was able to rouse similar resentments and fanaticism in Germany under conditions not nearly as dire as those in most Middle East countries today. The proof of similar demagogic success in the Middle East is all around.

Later adding:

After we, or our children and grandchildren, find ourselves living at the mercy of people with no mercy, what will future generations think of us, that we let this happen because we wanted to placate "world opinion" by not acting "unilaterally"?

From this point, we are just inches away from the “kill e’m all and let God sort ‘em out” position of Walter E. Williams, our Padded Cell Conservative of the Week. Good reason to name Thomas Sowell our Wild-Eyed Fear Monger of the Week, with emphasis on the wild-eyed (and myopic) mongering.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Padded Cell Conservative of the Week: 8-26-06

In his column published in Wednesday’s Deseret Morning News, Archconservative columnist Walter E. Williams, professor of economics at George Mason University, wonders whether the U.S. has the capacity to wipe terrorism from the face of the earth:

Think about it. Currently, the United States has an arsenal of 18 Ohio class submarines. Just one submarine is loaded with 24 Trident nuclear missiles. Each Trident missile has eight nuclear warheads capable of being independently targeted. That means the United States alone has the capacity to wipe out Iran, Syria or any other state that supports terrorist groups or engages in terrorism — without risking the life of a single soldier.

Okay, I’ve thought about it. Hell, I’ve even done the math: 18 x 24 x 6 = 3,456 submarine-launched nuclear warheads. Yup, we could kill ‘em all and let God sort ‘em out, all right.

Williams continues:

Terrorist supporters know we have this capacity, but because of worldwide public opinion, which often appears to be on their side, coupled with our weak will, we'll never use it. Today's Americans are vastly different from those of my generation who fought the life-and-death struggle of World War II. Any attempt to annihilate our Middle East enemies would create all sorts of handwringing about the innocent lives lost, so-called collateral damage.

Professor Williams, when you tell the world that our nation is weak willed, you only encourage our enemies and endanger our troops! Why do you hate America?

And what’s this business about “so-called collateral damage?” As if this euphamism were originated by those of us who are concerned about the needless destruction of innocent lives! Sorry, pal, you can’t pin that one on us.

I'm not suggesting that we rush to use our nuclear capacity to crush states that support terrorism. I'm sure there are other less drastic military options. What I am suggesting is that I know of no instances where appeasement, such as the current western modus operandi, has borne fruit.

Actually, you did suggest exactly that. Only “worldwide public opinion” and “our weak will” prevents us. Remember? Of course, I don’t look to conservative whackos for clear recollection of history – after all, they do keep trying to analogize the current situation in the Middle East with the very different circumstances of the 1940’s – but you made that very suggestion was just a few minutes ago, for crying out loud!

And here we go, trotting out that loaded term “appeasement” again! Rushing into the invasion of Iraq, we heard it time and time again: In 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain announced a deal to appease Adolf Hitler by declaring “Peace in our time.”

Well, here I go, trotting out the recurrently necessary accusation of black-and-white thinking again! The gamut of possible responses to Iran, and terrorism in general, is not exhausted by the false option of either “appeasement” or military annihilation. Indeed, if we learned anything from the growing fiasco in Iraq, it is this: working through the UN to construct a system of military containment and weapons inspection was effective! Saddam had no WMD!

Would the same approach work against Iran today? Thanks to Bush’s invasion of Iraq, probably not. But just as the options were not limited to the two prior to the invasion, neither are they limited to three now. One thing is clear, however: the military solution to Iraq has only made matters worse, aiding terrorist recruiting capabilities while simultaneously eliminating Iran’s most proximate and formidable enemy.

Imagine the possibilities, had Bush not cut and run from the war against al Qaeda and the Taliban. We would be fully engaged in the real war against terrorism, Iran would still harbor questions concerning Saddam’s ability to renew the 8 year long war Iran-Iraq war, and a broader range of diplomatic options would be yet available.

Williams concludes with this professorial gem:

Anyone who thinks current western appeasement efforts will get Iran to end its nuclear weapons program and end its desire to eliminate Israel is dumber than dumb.

Despite the elimination of viable options available prior to Bush’s illogical and illegal invasion of Iraq, anyone who thinks the problems of Iran, Israel and jihadism present a simple “either-or” response is simpleminded beyond belief. Worse yet, anyone who believes entire populations should be “wiped out” for the sake of destroying dangerous rogue regimes ought to be locked away and kept under heavy sedation.

For this reason, Walter E. Williams is our Padded Cell Conservative of the Week.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

The Real Issue in Utah's 2nd District Race

Today’s DMN includes a pair of reports by Bob Bernick Jr. on Utah’s 2nd Congressional District race. Actually, it isn’t much of a race at the moment, as polls show incumbent Jim Matheson leads challenger LaVar Christensen by 40 percentage points, with fewer than 10 percent undecided.

According to Bernick’s article, 2nd District hopeful to start running TV ads, Christensen is about to unveil a television ad campaign designed to introduce 2nd District voters to his conservative credentials.

From the article:

Christensen said the new ad, titled "Know LaVar," reviews his sponsorship of the 2004 state constitutional amendment that defined a traditional marriage and another Christensen bill that promoted civic and character education in Utah schools.

Bernick’s companion report, Matheson far enough to the right for Utahns, highlights the fact that the incumbent has voted with George W. Bush and the Republican House majority nearly 50 percent of the time:

The National Journal, in its yearly assessment of how representatives voted on a liberal/conservative range of topics, says that in 2005 Matheson was one of a handful of "centrists" — representatives who voted close to 50-50 on the "liberal" and "conservative" scale.The newspaper, which reports on Congress, said Matheson voted 54.2 percent of the time as a "liberal" and 45.8 percent of the time as a "conservative."

Christensen responds:

Matheson "strategically" votes with Republicans "on random occasions" just to make it look like he's an acceptable, middle-of-the-road representative, says [LaVar] Christensen. But on many other occasions, when it really matters, Matheson votes with the national Democrats

And just what might these “random occasions” that don’t really matter include? Again from Bernick’s second report:

Matheson has voted with the Republicans on their "agenda" issues, including votes to protect "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, against Internet gambling and for a U.S. constitutional amendment to confine marriage to a man and a woman only.

In other words, Republican candidate LaVar Christensen believes the U.S. House Republicans’ so-called “American Values Agenda” doesn’t really matter. And yet, these are precisely the kinds of issues he will emphasize in his coming ad campaign.

Moreover, he has the gall to proclaim himself a “principal-based” candidate:

"We're confident that, as voters get to know me, they will agree that it is time for principle-based representation in Washington."

Wow! How out of touch is that?

There are two critical problems these days with labeling oneself “principal-based.” First, the desirability of this generic trait depends entirely upon what those principals are. Second, the unyielding primacy in Washington D.C. during the past 5 ½ years of the brand of “principals” Christensen claims to represent is precisely what has gotten us into the myriad messes we’re in today.

And that’s the real issue here. For Democrats, the only count that matters right now is the ratio of D’s to R’s in the House and Senate. A shift to Democratic leadership in Congress will bring several noticeable changes:


  • Control of the legislative agenda
  • The power to schedule hearings on long-neglected issues of crucial importance
  • The power to subpoena witnesses and place them under oath
  • Increased coverage by the “regurgitate whatever those in power say” media
  • A genuine Constitutional check against Bush’s ongoing executive power grab
  • A roadblock to Karl Rove’s ability to jam legislative “wedge issues” into the 2008 Presidential election

In short, our solutions to today’s problems, which the Right loves to claim do not exist – a claim that too often seems true, given the media’s woeful negligence in providing coverage to the opposition party’s ideas – will finally come to the forefront. And maybe, just maybe, things will begin to change and certain individuals will actually be held accountable for their actions during the past half-decade.

The bottom line is that personal voting records and principals don’t bear much weight in Utah’s 2nd District race. It’s all about D’s outnumbering R’s at the national level.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

DMN Readers Comment on the Protest

Readers weigh in on protest

This morning's Deseret Morning News included a collection of readers' comments on next week's protest during President Bush's visit to our fair city: 2 supporting and 6 against.

Let's take a look at each comment, one-by-one.

Salt Lake City voters truly deserve Rocky Anderson after voting him into office. The rest of the state doesn't know if we should laugh or cry.
Steve Kuykendall
Saratoga Springs

This one is too easy: Utah voters truly deserve George W. Bush after giving him the nation’s highest percentage of the popular vote – twice – and continuing to give approval ratings well above 50 percent. The rest of the country – and the world, for that matter – don’t know if they should laugh or cry.

We (supporters) are not embarrassed of Rocky Anderson. The only thing we are embarrassed about is our neighbors still blindly follow President Bush and his policies despite overwhelming evidence supporting his fatuousness.
Weston Clark
Salt Lake City

No kidding! Sign suggestion for next week’s protest:

President Bush, welcome to Utah!
Among the nation’s leaders in:
Mortgage Fraud
Multilevel Marketing Schemes
Support for Your Presidency!

Maybe ethics are too backward and antiquated for a forward thinking man like Mayor Rocky Anderson.
Megan Oliphant
Layton

Maybe your spoon-fed brand of “ethics” are. Really, one shouldn’t choose one’s party affiliation based upon the similarity of one’s surname to the party’s mascot, Ms. Eleph —er, Oliphant.

The photo of Cindy Sheehan hugging Hugo Chavez should have made her sympathetic followers wise up.
Dottie Detsch-Bean
Salt Lake City

Her sympathetic followers? There’s an insight into the rabidly conservative mind! Just as "a thief thinks everyone steals," so do so many residents of this sheepish state believe everyone is a “follower” of something.

I doubt President Bush, his personal views notwithstanding, would treat Mayor Rocky Anderson in this fashion. The mayor not only disagrees, he is disagreeable and derelict in his civic understanding.
Ed Smith
West Bountiful

Indeed. I am sure Mayor Anderson, being the city’s highest officeholder, has been invited to attend the convention at which the president will be the guest of honor. Oh, wait … not according to this article in today’s DMN. I’m sure the president will ask that the convention’s organizers correct the dereliction of this unfortunate slight.

I was appalled at your editorial blasting Rocky Anderson. You stated he invited Cindy Sheehan for an anti-Bush rally. Then you said Miss Sheehan visited Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Cuba's Fidel Castro. You were unfairly trying to connect the dots that Rocky must be a communist. Quit trying to re-create the McCarthyism of guilt by association.
Kurt Gillespie
Fairfield, Calif.

Living in California, perhaps Mr. Gillespie does not understand that this is simply how we do things here in Utah. Watch the papers when the legislature is in session, Mr. Gillespie. You will quickly discover that, according to the Deseret Thesaurus of Political Terminology, Democrat is precisely synonymous with Communist.

Rocky Anderson represents the growing atmosphere of disrespect and disharmony that are so pervasive in the political scene today.
Joan Hudgins
Orem

Many have commented that the roots of this pervasive political “disrespect and disharmony” originated with the rightwing push to impeach President Clinton on charges arising from what amounts to Scaife-funded, media-enabled ambush and entrapment. Thank whatever god you think might be listening that the current president, a proven “uniter, not a divider,” has shown us the way out of those dark woods!

While Rocky Anderson and Cindy Sheehan are doing their little protest, I'll be one veteran in attendance with the American Legion, proud of what it stands for. I will also be proud of a president who respects us all enough to be here.
Burt Cassity
Salt Lake City

My, my, how Mr. Cassity’s respectful little chest must be swelling! I sure hope he enjoys his little convention. For my part, I’ll be one veteran attending the little protest, proud of a Constitution that, for the time being, still protects my right to do so.

Well now, that was a fun little sitting-duck hunt!

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

Bush Is Not Rocky's Commander-In-Chief

From today's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum:

Rocky mocks office of mayor
When I was in the military during World War II, I was told that I was not saluting the man but the rank. Likewise, whether we agree with President Bush or not, we should still honor the office of the president of the United States. This is something Rocky Anderson refuses to do. By his actions, Rocky has made the office of mayor a complete mockery.
Donald Pack

Salt Lake City

I was in the military during the Reagan administration. One task required during boot camp was to memorize one's entire chain of command, from platoon sergeant all the way up to commander-in-chief. While I cannot now recall every name in that list, I do know this: the mayor of my hometown was not among them!

Mr. Pack, George W. Bush is not Rocky Anderson's commander-in-cheif! Given that you and I are no longer active members of the armed forces, he is not ours, either! He is our president, Mr. Pack, nothing more. None of us outside the military has taken an oath to "obey the orders of the President of the United States," or support him, refrain from protesting him, or anything else along those lines.

Rocky does not "mock the office of mayor," as the title of this letter suggests. Neither does he mock the office of president. He potests the actions and policies of the man abusing that office! That is a solemn right of every private American citizen.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

Turning Right-wing Arguments on their Heads

From today's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum:

Bush eavesdropping is suspect
When President Bush eavesdrops on terrorists, he should have no problem with allowing the special "secret court" to review the calls. It is only when he is eavesdropping on other people that he must hide the information. By not allowing the review, he is (in my opinion) probably eavesdropping on political enemies.
Bob Neale

Salt Lake City


As we all should know, the problem with Bush's wiretapping program arises from his refusal to follow Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) requirement and obtain warrants for domestic eavesdropping activity. There are two reasons why this legal requirement should not hinder legitimate eavesdropping:

1. There are numerous FISA judges, available 24 hourse a day, 7 days a week
2. In cases where immediacy is required, warrants may be obtained up to 72 hours after the fact.

One often-heard argument against enforcing this legal requirement (and other Bush transgressions upon our Bill of Rights) says, "If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear."

This defense is weak and dangerous. Weak, in that even the vast majority of us who probably don't need to fear that the NSA's eavesdropping program will land us in Gitmo nevertheless suffer erosion of the Constitutional separation of powers and the protections granted by our Bill of Rights -- two indespensible pillars of our government. Dangerous, in that one can easily imagine German citizens of the late 1930s and early '40s saying, "If you're not doing anything against the Fatherland, you have nothing to fear."

Mr. Neale's letter turns this defense on it's head: President Bush, if you are not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear from a FISA review!

In a government "of the people, by the people and for the people," this is the only version of this argument that makes sense.

Unwarranted domestic spying is illegal, unconstitutional, and demonstrably unamerican!

Which reminds me of another effective reversal of Right-wingnut argumentation:

Q: Why do you hate America (or our troops, etc.)
A: Why do you hate our Constitution (or our Bill of Rights, etc)?

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

Mayor Ted Wilson Asks the Right Question

This letter appeared in today's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum:

Former mayor backs Rocky
Regarding your editorial of Aug. 19: You ask about Mayor Rocky Anderson and Cindy Sheehan and say, "At what point does opposition to a war cross over the line of aiding the enemy?"
I ask you, at what point does a war add to the enemy's enthusiasm for terrorism and recruiting suicidal bombers? Add this former mayor to those who would organize and will join the demonstration against this bloody, aiding-the-enemy war.
Ted Wilson
former mayor of Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City


This is an excellent example of how to turn a baseless right-wing talking point on its head by redirecting it at empirical facts.

A fine job, Mayor Ted! Damn good to hear from you on this issue!

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Aftermath of a Storm Named "Hyperbole"

From today's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum:


Kudos on storm cleanup
Kudos to Salt Lake County and the residents of the East Millcreek and Canyon Rim areas. Our neighborhoods were devastated by the storm, but no one waited for "someone else" to do the cleanup. Families, friends, neighbors, church quorums and Boy Scout troops pitched in. Then the county arrived with Dumpsters and heavy equipment. One would be hard-pressed now to even tell we had a storm.

Michele Staker
Salt Lake City

To begin, I’ll confess that letters beginning with the word “kudos” always bring a smirk to my face. That petulant smirk quickly faded, however, upon reading that the Salt Lake County neighborhoods mentioned were “devastated” by this recent storm.

Devastated? No kidding? I read the local papers every day, but cannot recall a single article on this devastation: the destruction of infrastructure; the many lives lost; the families displaced, returning to find their homes obliterated. I am constantly amazed, in this day and age of mass communication and multi-media, that we can remain so woefully uninformed of such important events!

Perhaps the situation was so bad that neither media nor FEMA could gain access. Fortunately, the plucky survivors weren't about to wait around for "someone else" to come to their aid. Somehow, they were able to set their greiving and self-pity aside long enough to clean up the damage left by this inexplicably unnamed storm. It sure sounds like a lesson to those government-aid-addicted residents of New Orleans and other victims of essentially identical episodes of nature’s fury!

One obvious question stands unaddressed, however. Given that this devastation occurred outside Salt Lake City limits, one has to ask: how does Mayor Rocky Anderson figure into this? How might his environmental programs have contributed to the developing fury of this storm? What did he do that may have delayed the delivery of food, water and medical supplies? How many ways can we attempt to hang the blame around his deserving neck?

Kudos indeed, Ms. Straker. Thanks for finally bringing this uplifting tale of human courage and self-reliance to the world’s attention. Had it not been for the necessity of wall-to-wall coverage of a recent confession in a decade-old murder case, I am certain every cable news channel would be swarming your streets, searching for tales of heartache, heroism, humanity and, above all, hope. Yes, hope for us all.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Don't let them get away with "Islamic fascism"

The right-wing echo chamber’s current fondness for the phrase “Islamic fascists” had me rolling my eyes from the first time I heard it. Now there’s an oxymoron, I thought: As if al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and the like are theocratic nationalists. I thought it, but didn’t write about it. A comment left on Saturday’s Sofa King Redneck post convinced me that more needs to be said.

Fortunately, my procrastination allowed time for Geoffrey Nunberg’s opinion piece from the L.A. Times to appear in Saturday’s Salt Lake Tribune. Nunberg, a linguist at the University of California at Berkeley, is author of the recently released book, Talking Right. With Talking Right, Nunberg joins his Berkeley colleague, George Lakoff (Moral Politics and other titles), to form a dynamic duo dedicated to helping the rest of us understand how the Right manipulates language, and what we can do about it.

The main thing we can do is stop ignoring it and allowing them to achieve their manipulative, propagandistic aims unchallenged.

In his opinion piece, Nunberg gives us a little history on the “loosening” of the word fascist. Ironically, it seems certain liberals of the Vietnam era are to blame for popularizing its use as a hyperbolic appellative for anyone and anything that smacked of despotism or totalitarianism. And that’s the key: totalitarianism is an aspect of fascism, but not all totalitarians are necessarily fascists.

While Wikipedia and Encarta provide lengthy analyses of the political implications of fascism, a more direct route to understanding the basics may be found in Fordham University’s Internet Modern History Sourcebook, which includes a translation of Benito Mussolini’s own definition of fascism, as published in the 1932 Italian Encyclopedia.

Common to all of these definitions and analyses are nationalism, militarism, and the subjugation of all aspects of citizenship and society to the will of the state.

Mussolini adds supportive concepts such as the glorification of war and conquest, reverence for heroism, and affirmation of “the immutable, beneficial, and fruitful inequality of mankind.”

As Nunberg points out, these concepts would seem to be reflective of values held also by al Qaeda and other jihadist organizations. However, these are supportive rather than uniquely descriptive concepts of fascism. One may also find these supportive concepts behind theocratic movements, such as the Spanish Inquisition, supposedly communist movements, such as Stalin’s Soviet Union, and even to some degree within democratic movements, such as the 19th century expansionism of the United States.

These supportive concepts are therefore not sufficient to define the term fascism.

It is important to note that religion and theocracy do not figure into the core of any of the analyses or definitions of fascism referenced above. Indeed, religion, if it is to be tolerated at all within a fascist state, must always be subordinate to, and a tool of, the purposes of the state. This is clearly indicated in this statement, from Mussolini’s definition:

The foundation of Fascism is the conception of the State, its character, its duty, and its aim. Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State.


It seems possible, then, that an “Islamic fascist” government might exist. Indeed, Saddam Hussein’s Baathist regime, insofar as it used religion as a tool to support the totalitarian aims of the state, might be viewed as a perfect example. Those seeking totalitarian theocracy, to which even the will of the state would be subordinate, do not qualify as fascists.

Nunberg suggests that this recent usage among Bush’s apologists is a blatant attempt to generate an emotional (and illogical) link between the current “war on terror” and World War II, “the last just war.” I think he is exactly right.

Note: links to letters and articles published in the Salt Lake Tribune are generally only active during the week following publication. After seven days, these items are locked away in their pay-per-view archive.

Weekly Roundup of Salt Lake Global Warming News and Opinion: 8/20/06

Deseret Morning News

The DMN kicked off the week with an article that tries to suggest global warming is actually a good thing. A couple of articles appeared on alternative fuel development and utilization programs. They also ran a couple of pieces on Senator John McCain (R-AZ), both of which mention his acceptance of global warming science.

Monday
Studying the effects of climate variability on prairie grasses – note the blatant spin in the opening and closing paragraphs.

Tuesday
U of U Professor Gary M. Sandquist (or is it Sandhurst?) calls for more nuclear power plants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Wednesday
Testing the political waters in the corn belt, John McCain includes greenhouse gas reduction among his reasons for supporting ethanol production.

Thursday
Using methane gas emissions from Salt Lake County landfill to generate electricity for Murray homes

Friday
Bob Fisher, our Ostrich Farmer of the Week.

Sunday
John McCain: “I believe that climate change is real.”

David E. Jensen argues that reducing fossil fuel consumption can be compatible with economic growth


Salt Lake Tribune

No news, all opinion in the Trib this week. Not terribly surprising, perhaps, given their week-long, in-depth coverage in last week’s series. Notably, three local residents were published in response to the fallacies expressed by last week’s Ostrich Farmer of the Week.

Monday
Ted Wilson of SLC (Mayor Ted?): drop politics, unite against global warming

William White of SLC provides evidence to debunk ostrich farmer Jim Elwell’s claim that the OISM deserves recognition

Murray’s Phillip Dennison highlights the consensus among genuine, peer-reviewed scientific studies in response to Jim Elwell’s letter

Tuesday
Yours truly in response to ostrich farmer Jim Elwell: “this debate is over.”

Wednesday
Bloomberg columnist Matthew Lynn gives industry arguments too much weight, but nevertheless includes greenhouse gas emissions among reasons businesses should wean themselves from air travel

From the Orlando Sentinel: Pastor Joel C. Hunter of Longwood, FL includes anti-global warming rhetoric among “below the belt” tactics the Christian Right must abandon

Tim Garrett of SLC believes increased efficiency leads to redistribution, rather than overall decrease, of energy consumption. Alternative energy sources are therefore necessary.

Thursday
The less-edited version of ostrich farmer Bob Fisher’s ridiculous letter.

Friday
Minneapolis Star Tribune editorial: improvements in climate science methods tend to reveal that the situation is worse than we had hoped.

Saturday
Arthur Sutherland of Sandy responds to ostrich farmer Jim Elwell’s gullible acceptance of “Astroturf”

Peter S. Lenz of SLC notes that population growth can quickly outstrip greenhouse gas reduction efforts

Sunday
Miami Herald editorial: Energy Department pushing for new nuclear plants to answer greenhouse gas problem, still no answer for nuclear waste problem.

Note: links to letters and articles published in the Salt Lake Tribune are generally only active during the week following publication. After seven days, these items are locked away in their pay-per-view archive.

Wild-Eyed Fear Monger of the Week: 8/19/06

Last week, this award went to syndicated columnist Cal Thomas, who firmly believes we are at risk of Islamic jihadists overthrowing our government and subjecting us all to Sharia law. This week's honoree follows in the same vein.

Robert Taylor concluded his letter to the Deseret Morning News, published in Monday's Readers' Forum, with this statement:

To remain in denial about terrorists is to condemn all Americans and our allies to the loss of our spiritual and personal freedoms.

We gave Mr. Taylor's letter a full going-over in a previous post. We will grant him this, however: If shifting focus from Afghanistan and al Qaeda to Iraq and Saddam qualifies as being "in denial about terrorists," and if this shift is part of a larger campaign which includes deterring any meaningful investigation into evidence of a broad-based administrative power grab, then his point is well taken.

We get the idea Mr. Taylor wouldn't agree with this assessment, however, and therefore name him Wild-Eyed Fear Monger of the Week.

Sofa King Redneck of the Week: 8/19/06

Who else? The distinguished senator from Virginia, George Allen, of course!

Of all the coverage I've seen and heard this week, Air America's Randi Rhodes rose above the rest by highlighting two key facts:

1. "Macaca," a genus of Old World monkeys including macaques and rhesus monkeys, is a French Tunisian racial epithet.

2. George Allen's mother is an immigrant from French Tunisia.

"I meant to say Mohawk," my ass!

Senator George Allen (R-VA), Sofa King Redneck of the Week!

Padded Cell Conservative of the Week: 8/19/06

We came across Chris Hughes' letter in Thursday's Deseret Morning News. We'll let our previous post stand in explanation of why that letter warrants this award, with just one addition:

Hey, Chris ... BOO!

Chris Hughes, of Alpine, Utah, ladies and gentlemen: Padded Cell Conservative of the Week!

Ostrich Farmer of the Week: 8/19/06

We visited Bob Fisher's letter yesterday. While the Salt Lake Tribune's version of this letter, which ran in Thursday's edition, included more of Mr. Fisher's disconnected rantings, Friday's Deseret Morning News included just these two sentences:

All you hear about lately is global warming. So last week I went out and bought a bigger snow blower.


You know, they talk an awful lot about gravity holding things to the Earth, too; but scientists can't seem to give us all the details on exactly what gravity is and how it works. Sure, the evidence suggests that gravity is occuring, and you hear people say "what goes up must come down" all the time, but can they really prove it? Maybe Mr. Fisher should avoid air travel.

Come to think of it, I keep hearing that the Earth is round, but looking out my window, I don't see it. And how come every time I see a map in a book, it's always flat? There may be an edge to the Earth out there somewhere yet! And who knows where? Sure, the liberal text books will tell you that many have "cicumnavigated" the so-called "globe," and scientists claim they have measured it's supposed "circumference," but only a fool would simply take their word for it! Maybe Mr. Fisher should swear off travel, altogether.

Just stay at home, strap yourself to a chair, and rest on your laurels, Mr. Fisher. After all, you have earned the title, Ostrich Farmer of the Week.

Hyper-Religious Whacko of the Week: 8/19/06

Having given due consideration to Utah state senator Chris Buttars (R-West Jordan) for requesting that Utah State attorneys draft a bill on his behalf defining "separation of church and state," as well as his proposed bill aimed at placing "activist judges" under recurrent legislative review, we just don't have enough information yet about the proposed separation bill. We'll place this one on the back burner for future consideration, and present this week's award to:

Lt. General H. Steven Blum
Chief, National Guard Bureau

for this remark, quoted in the current edition of Newsweek:


"Agnostics, atheists and bigots suddenly lose all that when their life is on the
line."

This is an obvious retooling of the old claim that "there are no atheists in foxholes," often cited to imply that the convictions of atheists and their ilk cannot possibly withstand the converting power of looking death square in the eye. It's nonsense, of course, but this is not the reason the Guard's highest ranking officer warrants this award of dubiouis distinction.

General Blum gets this week's nod for his outrageous association of agnostics and atheists with bigots.

It is worth noting that, in its earliest usage, the word bigot was defined as "a superstitious hypocrite." This etymological definition still rings true, in the sense that stereotypical beliefs concerning specific groups of people are on an equal intellectual footing with superstitions. One might even define bigotry as being rooted in negative superstitions about "different" people.

On the topic of religious belief, non-believers tend to view religion as an institutionalization of superstition. More over, devotees to one religion often accuse others as being poluted by superstitions. In any case, agnostics, atheists and other skeptics of popular belief systems are clearly least prone to accept superstitious beliefs at face value.

Add to this the obvious fact that suggesting others harbor superstitions or stereotypes which you yourself exhibit qualifies as an act of hypocrisy, and who is the bigot now, General Blum?

Lt. General H. Steven Blum: this week's Hyper-Religous Whacko of the Week!

Editing Nonsense to Leave ... Nonsense!

Check out this clever two-liner, from this morning's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum. I found it helpful to picture Bob Hope on stage, leaning casually upon a golf club as I read:

Global warming? Nonsense!
All you hear about lately is global warming. So last week I went out and bought a bigger snow blower.
Bob Fisher

Murray

Ba-dum-ching!

We'll likely revisit this letter in our Weekly Awards of Dubious Distinction, as well as our Weekly Roundup of Salt Lake Global Warming News and Opinion. In the mean time, compare to less-edited version the Salt Lake Tribune published yesterday.

Of course, had the DMN editors trimmed all of the nonsense from this letter, we would have been left with nothing but the writer's name and city of residence.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Exposing the Con in "Neo-Con"

From today's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum:

Conservatives duped voters
Mike Leavitt's recently uncovered tax dodge is a perfect symbol of the last decade of
Republican rule. Conservatives like Leavitt promised to reduce the size of government and usher in a new age of honor and public integrity. In reality, these pious frauds are running the biggest shell game in modern history. While Americans look for the pea, Republicans are waging disastrous wars, piling up ruinous debt and passing crummy laws that benefit them and their rich friends. We can't lay all the blame on crooked politicians. Swindlers need dupes. And Republican voters are the perfect marks. But even Republicans will eventually tire of getting ripped off. By then, the fast-buck artists will have skipped town, and we'll be left holding the bag.
J. Bryan Larsen

Murray

This letter cuts right to the heart of what has been taking place politically -- and particularly, electorally -- in recent years. Why does Utah continue to give Bush the highest ratings of any state in the nation? Might the answer be related to the fact that Utah also ranks second in the nation for mortgage fraud and and #1 for multi-level marketing schemes?

Well said, Mr. Larsen. Very well said!

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Protect Us From Michael Moore and the Shadows of Doubt!

From today's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum:

Victim story is backward
It seemed odd for the Deseret Morning News to set Joseph Vogel up as a martyr (Aug. 7). He was part of the tidal wave of on-campus liberal propaganda. A few Utah County conservatives had the courage to attempt to set up sandbags around their homes. Don't you have the victim story backward?
Chris Hughes

Alpine

That’s right: Whenever controversy raises its disquieting head in this state, self-styled spokespeople for the political, religious, racial, or sexually-orientated majority are quick to point out that they are somehow the true victims!

This phenomenon has become so predictable and pervasive that we really ought to consider abandoning the beehive in favor of a paranoid whipping-boy as Utah's official state symbol.

The writer's tidal wave-sandbag metaphor is also inapt. The real threat he fears comes as a flood of enlightenment. What these "few Utah County conservatives" really need to do is brick up their windows and seal up the interiors of their homes with sheets of heavy, black plastic and duct tape.

You see, the danger of allowing enlightenment into one’s midst is that it might cast a shadow, and their own shadows are right at the top of a long list of things that scare the hell out of these timorous souls.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

NASA can't find moonlanding tapes. Riiight.

Reuters has more.

Let's face it, there was some alien ship or something on those videos, and now they've been "lost"? I'm so sure, NASA.

DS

Dueling Letters II: Who called for Dr. Phil?

From this morning's Deseret Morning News Readers' Forum: Another neocon apologist claims progressives don't get it, merely succeeds in displaying his own blind ignorance.

Like, Dr. Phil could dissuade Hitler
Tommy Masek wrote: "Killing people is not the way to peace." History begs to differ. Killing the enemy brought a welcomed end to WWI and WWII. I doubt letting Dr. Phil talk to Hitler would have brought an end to the pogroms of Jews. Believing you can always talk evil men out of doing evil deeds is naive and dangerous. An inability to recognize evil and know how to deal with it has afflicted the progressive movement for years.
Stephen Johansen
Sandy

Actually, Tommy Masek managed to touch upon a couple of excellent points in his brief letter, from Saturday's edition:


Killing isn't way to peace
George Bush and his vice president, Dick Cheney, took us to war against the entire Arab world, disguising it as "a war for democracy" in Iraq. The Republicans are making billions of dollars on the war and smear anyone who wants to stop it. Let's all stand up and tell Bush and his sick friends that killing people is not the way to peace.
Tommy Masek

Salt Lake City

The unprovoked invasion and horrifically managed occupation of Iraq has solidified the image of the U.S. as a domineering threat in the Middle East. It is this very image, in the minds of jihadists, that stokes the fires of terrorism. Killing people, especially innocents with no ties whatsoever to terrorist organizations, only serves to kindle more hatred in the minds of those who witness these atrocities in their homeland. Given this dynamic, when will we have killed enough people to bring “a welcomed end” to this open-ended, so-called war on terror?

Killing Nazi soldiers, on the other hand – particularly those occupying conquered lands – hardly produced the same effect in terms of inspiring converts to their underlying ideology. In this respect, war, conquest and conversion to “democracy” is the antithesis of a logical response to the growing jihadist ideology.

Profiteering by Bush Administration cronies, enabled through non-competitive government contracts and the blind eye of administrative oversight, reveals the primary motive behind this invasion. The true nature of this motive is exposed by the long list of lies that preceded invasion and the widespread smears aimed at muting dissenting opinion.

Going into Afghanistan after 9/11 to defeat al-Qaeda and their Taliban protectorate was a genuine act of national self-defense. Shifting focus toward the conquest of Iraq, at the expense of unfinished business in Afghanistan, was not only unnecessary, it was outrageously foolish.

Mr. Masek did not call for Dr. Phil to solve the problem of terrorism. That is Mr. Johansen’s ridiculous straw man. Setting Dr. Phil up as the progressive approach to confronting jihadist terrorism reveals the extent to which Johansen fails to understand our position. Defending unwarranted death, destruction, and conquest in the Middle East reveals the extent to which he fails to understand the underpinnings of Islamic jihadism.

To paraphrase Johansen’s concluding statement: An inability to comprehend alternative ideologies and how to deal with them has afflicted the American conservative movement for years.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

Dueling Letters, Both Miss the Mark

A letter in Monday's Deseret Morning News caught my eye, and inspired me to review the letter to which this writer was resonding. First, the letter from last Friday's Readers' Forum:

We are responsible for war
Why are we at war. How do we change our situation? Each American citizen should ask: How honest am I? How moral am I? How kind and gentle? How spiritual? If you think your answers to these questions have no relationship to the war — think again. Look at history. Our president didn't lead us into war. You and I did!

Doramae Michael
Brigham City

Now, I don’t necessarily agree with the opinion expressed in this letter. She may be on to something in the generalized sense of a virtuous nation being comprised of virtuous people, but I am not entirely sure I agree that we are each therefore to blame. I’d go a lot farther with her if I weren’t convinced that the Republican National Crime Family stole both of the elections Bush is supposed to have won.

I, for one, am not about to accept any portion of the blame for anything that usurpatious bastard has done during the last 5-1/2 years, and I don’t believe anyone who voted for Kerry in ’04 or the clear majority who voted for Gore in 2000 should either!

At bottom, her letter hardly warrants a response because it just doesn’t make much sense.

Robert Taylor feels otherwise:

Some in denial about threat
Doramae Michael (Readers' Forum, Aug. 11) believes that any kind of war is dishonest,
immoral, ungentle and nonspiritual. We cannot ignore the threat we now face. To remain in denial about terrorists is to condemn all Americans and our allies to the loss of our spiritual and personal freedoms.

Robert Taylor
Salt Lake City

In the first place, I do not see where Ms. Michael mentioned “any kind of war,” or “war in general,” or “all wars.” In fact, she specifically referred to “the war.” A fair question might be, “which war?”

The war in Iraq? The war in Afghanistan? “The war on terror?” “The war on Christmas?”

While she does not specify overtly (in this undoubtedly edited version of her letter, at least) we do have a telling clue: the commonly heard phrase “lead us into war” can only refer to the Bush Administration’s dishonest and immoral push to invade Iraq.

Mr. Taylor doesn’t seem to care which war she is talking about. Without any evidence to support his conclusion, he has decided that she views them all with equal abhorrence (with the possible exception of the war on Christmas).

Take it easy on that straw man, Mr. Taylor. He ain’t done nothin’ to you!

With a flash of that rhetorical slight-of-ham-handedness we have come to associate with Bush and his supporters, Taylor broadens the focus from Iraq to terrorism in general. Come on now … haven’t we outgrown that game yet?

And what’s this nonsense about terrorists being a threat to our personal freedoms? Has Mr. Taylor been paying attention to what the Bush Administration has been up to since 9/11? Apparently, one ham-handed rhetorical turn deserves another.

Mr. Taylor – and Ms. Michael and everyone else, for that matter – should read Rep. John Conyers’ (D-MI) minority report, “The Constitution in Crisis.” Afterward, maybe we can speak with a little more clarity and focus about virtuousness and who lead whom into war.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

Comcast Strikes Again - Too Much is Never Enough

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle


Comcast Invisible Cap


On Saturday my internet service was disconnected again. I had to wait until today to get an answer from their "Network Abuse and Policy Observance" department. They told me that although I had cut my usage in half, it wasn't enough, and they were terminating my account for 12 months. Again they flatly refused to say how much was acceptable use. I requested they reenable my email for a period of one week so that I could switch any accounts to another address - they refused. I asked for a manger - they refused to tell me if they had one. I asked for another point of contact - they told me I was welcome to do my own research.

Needless to say, I'm pretty angry. I don't mind staying within defined usage limits, but I have a big problem with my service being shut off without any warning without defined reasons. The person I spoke to couldn't have been less helpful.

Unfortunately, since Comcast lobbied against communities laying fiber to the home, there is no comparable internet service in Salt Lake City. In any event, Rob and the others will be handling most of the posting on the Deseret Spectacle this week. I should be back up and running within a week or so.

UPDATED 02.08.2007: This post has been getting a lot of traffic thanks to the uprisings of others who have experienced the shady Comcast experience on this matter. Let me add a few details that might help:

They are completely inflexible on the situation. If you expect customer service, decency or explanations, you will be entirely disappointed.

When it comes to this point, you will be referred to what they call the "Network Abuse and Policy Observance" department. I heard a legend about a direct line in, but generally, you just leave a message and they call you back at their convenience.

No matter how obvious or stupid the situation is, they will never, ever tell you what an acceptable amount of usage is, only that you have violated it. They will not tell you what standard usage is, only that you exceed it. They seem completely oblivious to the absurdity of this. When I spoke with them, they refused to refer me to some else, or provide me contact information for anyone else. In fact, they refuse to give me any information whatsoever.

You can file complaints with the Better Business Bureau. Comcast will tend to wait months to respond, and when they do, it will be with a letter referring you to their fuzzy AUP. The BBB will then suggest you "compromise" even though you have been offered nothing - not even further information. If you do not respond to the BBB within 6 days they will close the case and assume that you are yet another satisfied customer. Comcast gets months to respond. You have a few days.

You can file a complaint with the FCC. You probably won't even get an acknowledgment that they've received your complaint. The Bush administration has transformed the FCC into an organization who seems concerned solely about "decency", and will not and does not advocate for the consumer. Period.

You can file a complaint with your regional franchise authority. They are generally on the side of Comcast over any matter, and you can expect abuse and skepticism from them. However, this may be one option that produces results.

You can file a complaint with any consumer advocacy agencies which may exist in your state. In Utah, and from what I can, in many other areas, they have absolutely zero power to do anything.

In on-line forums, you can expect a barrage of insults and abuse. Some of it is from Comcast agents, some of it from legitimate customers who have no idea what they're talking about. I have yet to see any Comcast-supporting-customer provide any evidence that heavy users affect their service in any way.

Comcast is a hugely powerful company. If you want to do something to fight them, support any organization which is fighting for net neutrality, which Comcast detests. A good starting place for net neutrality is here. Also learn to recognize the corporate fronts which are trying to obfuscate the issue. The fact is, that if we lose net neutrality, you will pay more, have less choice, censorship will become much, much more prevalent, and corporate monsters like Comcast will become even wealthier and powerful.

Finally - these are not nice people. They will punish you if they can. They tripled their profits last quarter. You think they care about you? Think again.

Good luck to those of you who are fighting the good fight.

DS
Deseret Spectacle

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Weekly Roundup of Salt Lake Global Warming News and Opinion

DESERET MORNING NEWS:

Just one global warming news item in the DMN this week. As usual, the DMN opinion editors chose to waste ink on a couple of submissions from those who see the world in 3-D (Delusion, Deception, Denial). Overall, however, it was a good week (for this paper, anyway) for the victorious side of this dead debate.

Monday

Global warming may be enabling the rapid spread of a particular fungus, causing decimation of the world’s frog species and severe disruption of the food chain.

Washington, UT resident Bruce Wilson doesn’t like Al Gore for several reasons – not all of which withstand a simple fact check – but nevertheless urges others to take him seriously on global warming.

Springville’s Chad Emmett calls for more bicycle lanes to increase safety, cites GW as a reason this warrants high priority status.

Wednesday

Centervillean Steve Russell sees an America held hostage by oil-drilling nations, points his fear-mongering finger at near-sighted politicians, power-hungry environmentalists, and the electorate at large.

Murray’s Rolland Kayser sets Ambose Putnam straight on the claim that more conservation means lower standard of living. We’re #6! We’re #6! We’re #6!

Tangential relationship to GW, but Scott Andreason of SLC notes enduring misinformation behind ad hominem arguments against Al Gore.

Thursday

Nevermind the consensus among members of the National Academy of Sciences. Hoover Institute Senior Fellow Thomas Sowell thinks it boils down to Richard S. Lindzen vs. Al Gore – and only Gore should be fact checked.

Sunday

Dan Brinton of Murray sees oil addiction as the national security issue. No mention of global warming concerns, specifically, but his call for alternative fuels development is worth noting.


SALT LAKE TRIBUNE:

The Trib did a fantastic job this week with their seven-part series on global warming. Below are the links to the primary articles in the series. These articles include additional links to a wealth supporting material.

The SL Trib's 7-Part Series:

Sunday: Series introduction and overview
Monday: Local research efforts to determine what global warming means for local environment
Tuesday: Focus on the future of Utah’s water supplies
Wednesday: The State’s indigenous species are in for dramatic changes to habitat and food chain
Thursday: Ski industry tops the list of GW victims, but other businesses are sure to feel the heat
Friday: What can local residents and governments do?
Saturday: Investigating the past for clues to the future; some conclusions and suggestions for avoiding the fate of the region’s ancient inhabitants

Additional News and Opinion:

Perhaps to simply reflect the fact that they do continue to receive letters from the ostrich farmers out there, the Tribune allowed a slimy remnant of the old debate to ooze into their Public Form section this week. Beyond that, the Trib had a stellar week, from beginning to end.

Tuesday

Studying Kansas prairie grass to understand the effects of increasing volatility and variability in local climates.

Tribune editorial board places oceanic degradation on par with global warming

SLC resident Olivia Filion: How can we claim “our children are our future” while simultaneously destroying their environmental inheritance?

Wednesday

Poll of hunters and anglers reveals an observant, discerning majority

Focus article on the future of indigenous species in a changing local climate

Thursday

William Saletan of the on-line magazine Slate sees a vicious cycle: warmer temps lead to more energy consumption, which leads to warmer temps …

SLC’s Jim Elwell – our Ostrich Farmer of the Week – cites a dusty, disingenuous and decidedly debunked petition as evidence that today’s leading climate scientists are wrong.

Friday

Using “Green Tags” to offset personal greenhouse gas emissions

Saturday

Letter to Trib’s Reader Advocate includes reporting on GW issues in list of evidence that the Trib is a left-wing propaganda machine

Sunday

In this op-ed by David Litvin, the president of the Utah Mining Association manages to discuss coal as an option for meeting future energy needs without giving so much as an “FU” to global warming concerns.

Wild-Eyed Fear Monger of the Week

Things were relatively quiet on the fear-mongering front this week – until, that is, British authorities uncovered that terrorist plot to blow up airplanes bound for the U.S.

Suddenly, the terrorism alert level shot up to orange and red in some areas, and the terrorism rhetoric level flew off the charts.

George Bush and his apologists were quick to point out that this event serves as a reminder that we are not safe. Newly proclaimed independent candidate for Senate Joe Lieberman chimed in with similar observations.

Oh, and staying the course in Iraq is obviously necessary. After all, the foiled plot appears to have been hatched by an al-Qaeda linked group working out of Pakistan. So, it’s good that we shifted our attention and resources to Iraq four years ago, leaving Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda cohorts free to roam the mountains of Pakistan and neighboring Afghanistan.

That is good … isn’t it?

The decision was tough, but that notorious windbag of syndicated print and Faux News Channel, Cal Thomas, finally took the cake with this conclusion to his frantic call to go on the offensive against Islamofascists, published in today’s Salt Lake Tribune:

We had better overthrow them before they overthrow us. Who can doubt their ultimate objective?

You see ... not only do these terrorists "hate us for our freedoms," they also clearly intend to conquer the United States of America and replace our Constitution with Sharia law.

Hey, Cal, look on the bright side: at least you'd finally realize your oft-expressed desire to see prayer restored to public schools.

Congratulations Cal Thomas! For showing us exactly what terrorists can accomplish (not through the meaning of your words, but rather, the irrational terror evident in them), we hereby dub thee: Wild-Eyed Fear Monger of the Week!

Note: links to letters and articles published in the Salt Lake Tribune are generally only active during the week following publication. After seven days, these items are locked away in their pay-per-view archive.

Sofa King Redneck of the Week

From Thursday’s Deseret Morning News: Shanze gets a fine, probation

I never really thought of “Super Dell” Shanze as a redneck. In fact, thanks to statements like this, he was a strong favorite for this week’s Hyper-Religious Whacko of the Week:


"If I was a really bad guy, would any of these news reporters be alive?" Schanze asked. "Ask yourself that question. You know you all have the ability to repent because of the grace of God, but you are still alive to do it, because of the grace of Super Dell."

The article also quotes Shanze claiming that the reporters covering his trial were “swayed by Satan.”

Yes, he almost had the Whacko award all sewn up. Then I found out his middle name is "Buck." Suddenly, I began to view him in an entirely different light.

What ol’ Quickdraw Buck Shanze is really talking about in the quotation above is bringing some good old-fashioned frontier justice to bear on those responsible for hitching his good name to their media wagon and dragging it through the mud.

Prior to this suggestive (if not quite threatening) exchange with reporters, Buck received this sentence:

Third District Judge Royal Hansen on Wednesday suspended a 180-day jail sentence, imposed a $285 fine, charged $207 for the speeding citation and ordered Schanze to take a "cognitive restructuring course," which assists people in learning how to detect errors in their thinking.

To which Pistol Packin’ Buck replied:

"Why in the world would you want to change the thinking of a self-made millionaire who's lectured at almost every college in the state?" he asked. "Yes, I'm exuberant and outgoing and a positive thinker. I'm extremely mentally stable, and I'm not one who would be a danger to society."

Oh, no! No danger at all! … unless society happens to be driving the streets of Draper or (heaven forbid!) standing between Buck Shanze and a TV camera!

Yup. Ol’ Buck, he’s more’n just a redneck. He’s one a them there high-falutin’, college lecturin’, self-made millionaire rednecks. He’s also Sofa King Redneck of the Week.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Padded Cell Conservative of the Week

Ron Zamir of Salt Lake City is a staunch devotee of “U.S. national interests.” He refers to these several times in his letter, published in Thursday’s Salt Lake Tribune. In fact, here’s the final tally:

References to U.S. national interests: 6
Definitions of U.S. national interests: 0

Just what are these “national interests” in the Middle East, anyway? Vince and Jennifer? American Idol? How are Baywatch’s ratings faring around the Persian Gulf these days?

Apparently, these interests have something to do with limiting Iranian power and influence throughout the Middle East. It is difficult to comprehend exactly how this factors in, given that the recent and rapid emergence of Iran as a dominating force results directly from the U.S. conquest of Iraq.

Hey, wait a minute … the Bush Administration wouldn’t act against U.S. interests, would they?

Yup, it’s crazy! Congratulations, Ron Zamir! You are this week’s Padded Cell Conservative of the Week.

Note: links to letters and articles published in the Salt Lake Tribune are generally only active during the week following publication. After seven days, these items are locked away in their pay-per-view archive.

Ostrich Farmer of the Week

This award recognizes exemplary efforts toward encouraging others to keep their heads in the sand on the issue of global warming.

This week’s ostrich farmer extraordinaire, Jim Elwell of Salt Lake City, rose above the pack in two respects.

First, he managed to get his letter published in Thursday’s Salt Lake Tribune. Prior to this letter’s appearance, remnants of the dead debate on global warming had been admirably absent from the Tribune’s opinion pages for quite some time.

Second, the foundation of Elwell’s argument lies in a long-since debunked petition dating back to the late 1990’s.

The notorious petition, decrying the reality of global warming and purportedly signed by more than 17,000 scientists, was circulated in 1998 by a fringe biochemist named Arthur Robinson through his oddball “research institution,” the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine. Among the OISM’s retail offerings: a home schooling kit designed for those concerned about rampant Marxist indoctrination in our public schools.

The Center for Media and Democracy’s Source Watch and Media Matters for America have the goods on Arthur Robinson and his petition.

That was quite an effort, Mr. Elwell! Got anything from the current century? Your historiographical prowess warrants the title: Ostrich Farmer of the Week.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Hyper-Religious Whacko of the Week

Last Saturday’s Deseret Morning News included a piece by Don Gale, in which the long-time editorialist of local print and airwaves provided a list of reasons Utahans ought to reconsider their devotion to President Bush.

Thursday, Ronald Kelsch of Sterling offered this response in the DMN Readers’ Forum. Two statements practically leapt from the page, screaming for this award. First:


The Utah mind sees the biblical writing upon the wall better than any other.

That’s right, brethren: the Utah mind! You know it’s near when you hear that droning chant, “One of us! One of us! One of us! …”

And later:


The wars in the Middle East are long overdue. Believe it or not, the God of providence is ruling

Yes, according to the aforementioned scriptural graffiti, these delinquent wars have racked up quite a sum in late fees. Bringing suit for foreclosure on specific properties was only a matter of time. We can expect a ruling from the Judge sometime around the End of Days.

In the meantime, Ronald Kelsch is this week’s Hyper-Religious Whacko of the Week.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

New Feature: Weekly Awards of Dubious Distinction

Today, we are pleased to unveil a new regular feature on this blog:

The Deseret Spectacle Weekly Awards of Dubious Distinction.

Each week, we will peruse the local dailies for particularly loony deeds and opinions. Our winners will be announced every Saturday, throughout the day.

Of course, we take particular interest in acknowledging lunacies of local origin, but absolutely anyone in the world is a potential honoree. The only requirements are:

1. The individual’s comments or actions gain local ink
2. Said comments or actions make us laugh while simultaneously shaking our heads

Throughout the day today, we will be publishing this week’s recipients of the following awards:

Hyper-Religious Whacko of the Week
Ostrich Farmer of the Week
Padded Cell Conservative of the Week
Sofa King Redneck of the Week
Wild-Eyed Fear Monger of the Week

So bookmark us now, if you haven't already, and check back throughout the day as we give this week’s honorees the recognition they so richly deserve. And remember: if you’re not laughing with us, chances are good that you’ll eventually find us laughing at you!

Japanese Pretty Sure they won't Destroy Universe

Japanese Scientists plan to create a "baby universe" which they're pretty sure will NOT destroy this one, which is good.

The key is a monopole, a unique sperical particle with only a north or south pole, only one charge. Adding mass and energy to this already extremely dense particle, could cause it to expand "eternally", providing the trigger needed to make the bubble of false vacuum into an ever-expanding universe, akin to our own, but entirely separate and likely to develop its own physical properties, laws and materials.

Wouldn't it be deliciously ironic if everyone warring with each other because their ideology is just sooo important, suddenly got annihilated by a collapse in space/time caused by Japanese scientists trying to create baby universes?

DS

Utah - Senatorial Debate

US Senatorial Debate featuring:

Pete Ashdown, Democratic nominee
Scott Bradley, Constitution nominee
Julian Hatch, Desert Green nominee
Roger I. Price, Personal Choice nominee
Rob Latham, Libertarian Party of Utah chair, officially representing
Libertarian nominee Dave Star Seely.
Open seat available for official representative of Orrin Hatch,
Republican nominee.

Saturday, August 12, 2006 (tomorrow!!)
10:30 AM-12:30 PM
Salt Lake City Main Library Auditorium
210 East 400 South
Salt Lake City

DS

Video of the Day - Lou Dobs and Without Precedent






DS

DMN Readers' Forum Editors: Equal Opportunity Hackers?

What's up in Connecticut?
Interestingly, 14,000 voters in Connecticut changed their affiliation from "undeclared" to Democrat to vote in their 2006 Democratic Primary. I wonder if they had to put up with the mindless banter that Utah's Republicans face each year.
Jeremy Roberts

Sandy

Nevermind Connecticut, what’s up with this letter? I’ve been trying to make some sense of these 37 words all morning. Although I'm not sure it occurs every year, the writer seems to refer to the recurring debate over closed-registration Utah Republican primaries vs. open-registration Utah Democratic primaries. But for this to be true, the pronoun “they” in the final sentences would have to refer to the Democrats. It clearly refers to voters who changed their affiliation.

Unless … a transitional sentence is missing. Suppose we plug in a sentence like this between the two published: Connecticut Democrats must restrict voting in their primaries to registered Democrats.

Ah, now it makes sense! The sentiment expressed is petty and insipid, but at least the paragraph becomes coherent.

Wow! Does this suggest that the DMN will even edit the opinions of true believers to the point of incoherency? Of course, an equally likely explanation is that Mr. Roberts' grammatical skills are on par with the miserable critical thinking skills his letter seems to suggest -- but even then, why is the DMN so willing to publish incoherent babble?

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Opinion - Kevin R. Anderson

ACLU shares porn blame
By his own admission, Craig Gregerson's actions were driven by an addiction to pornography. There is no greater enabler of child pornography in this country than the ACLU, which has spent millions of dollars facilitating and protecting the pedophile's access to obscene material that fuels deviant sexual appetites to the point of murderous actions.
Sexual predators are not created in a vacuum but without exception arise as the excremental byproduct of pornography.
The ACLU has opposed all reasonable efforts to protect children from the creators, purveyors and consumers of such "protected speech." Mr. Gregerson must bear full and complete responsibility for his actions; however, the ACLU must begin accepting some accountability for the sexually malicious environment they have created and safeguarded that continually puts at risk the most innocent members of our society.

Kevin R. Anderson
Salt Lake City


*sigh* What a day of bizarre, righteously-indignant bozos.

Okay, quick summary:

Sexual predators are not created in a vacuum but without exception arise as the excremental byproduct of pornography.

Oh yeah? Without exception, huh? This is based on what research? Your eager desire to hate the ACLU doesn't count.

Considering Utah leads the country searching the internet for porn, it's amazing we don't have murderous armies of pedophiles marching down the street.

By his own admission, Craig Gregerson's actions were driven by an addiction to pornography.

Yeah, it's almost as though he's trying to evade responsibility for his actions. But hey, nobody will fall for that.

The ACLU has opposed all reasonable efforts to protect children from the creators, purveyors and consumers of such "protected speech."

Which reasonable efforts are those, Mr. Anderson?

Mr. Gregerson must bear full and complete responsibility for his actions; however....

However, the real culprit is an organization dedicated to protecting our civil liberties. Duh.

...the ACLU must begin accepting some accountability for the sexually malicious environment they have created and safeguarded

You know what? You're right. Let's string them up. The Constitution is outdated anyway. We need to return to the days where a small group of unquestioned religious zealots get to determine what is okay to express. I can't wait.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Breaking - America and France agree on main points of Resolution to End Conflict in Lebanon


CNN has a big banner up. Now what?

DS

Opinion - Michael Heimbigner

Blame terrorists, not U.S.
So let me get this straight, Robert Hildebrand (Readers' Forum, Aug. 8). Terrorists dress their children in explosives and call them "our F-16s," blow up buses, stock tunnels with weapons, shoot missiles into neighborhoods, prevent women and children from leaving a war zone, intentionally fight in neighborhoods, have "kill them all" in their constitution, kidnap, torture and behead their enemies, hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, mine neighborhood streets, build countless car bombs and you condemn the USA and Israel for slaughtering children? If the entire world consisted of nothing but Hildebrands, please consider this American a Jew.

Michael Heimbigner
South Jordan

Mr. Heimbigner, more than 40,000 civilians have been killed in Iraq. Take a minute and think about that. Think of one person, then think of a family of 5, then think of a neighborhood of 60. To the families and friends of those killed, do you think they give a damn that the method in which they were killed wasn't as objectionable to you as the barbaric methods of terrorists?

Why are we even comparing the two? Do we have to constantly search out or create justification of our hate and obscene detachment?

... This kind of thinking exhausts me. If I think our foreign policy is failing, I must hate America. If I criticize the lies and failures which led us into war again Iraq, I must want Saddam Hussein back in power, rape rooms and all. If I think that the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent civilians is tragic, I approve of the method in which terrorists murder their victims. What the hell is going on? Are we really this insane?

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Opinion - George E. Jones

Lieberman committed deadly sin
I admire and respect Sen. Joe Lieberman, and there are not a lot of Democrats that I can say that about. I and many Republicans may disagree with him on many issues, but debates with him are always civil and intelligent. He epitomizes the term "loyal opposition."
His own party spent an obscene amount of time, effort and money (lots of money) to make sure that Lieberman didn't win his primary, and they will do the same to make sure he doesn't get re-elected. In short, the Democrat machine will risk giving Lieberman's seat in a narrowly divided Senate to a Republican rather than support their incumbent senator from Connecticut.
Lieberman committed the one mortal sin that no Democrat can atone for — he supports the president on the war. He wants the United States to win the war against terrorism and Islam fascism. With the reins of the Democratic Party in the hands of the anti-American left, is it any wonder that someone like Lieberman, a genuinely good man, would be given the "deep six"?
Not to me it isn't, but then I used to be a Democrat.

George E. Jones
Washington Terrace

The reason Republicans like Joe Lieberman is because Joe Lieberman is, essentially, a Republican. If Lieberman respected his party or the primary system, he would have the dignity and honor to accept his defeat and acknowledge that the Democrats of Connecticut have chosen someone else to represent them. This is not the "Democratic Machine", whatever that is, this is the people expressing their voice.

He epitomizes the term "loyal opposition."

Apparently, to a Republican, "loyal opposition" means "no opposition."

Watch this segue:

Lieberman committed the one mortal sin that no Democrat can atone for — he supports the president on the war.

If he would have stopped there, I could let it slide, but look at the transition:

He wants the United States to win the war against terrorism and Islam fascism.

Whoaaaa there, speed racer. Opposing a failed policy by the President is an ocean away from wanting the United States to lose the war against terrorism and Islamic fascism. This is called blind faith, and while it may be acceptable to some, there are many of us who would like to reserve the right to think for ourselves.

With the reins of the Democratic Party in the hands of the anti-American left, is it any wonder that someone like Lieberman, a genuinely good man, would be given the "deep six"?

The anti-American left? I still don't get this. A majority of the people in this country oppose the war. Are they anti-American? What kind of self-righteous delusional state does one have to reach to assume that disagreeign with Republicans over their failed methods equals an anti-American stance?

Mr. Jones, it's not just that the Political Right doesn't have a monopoly on patriotism or loving their country, it's that they have so distanced themselves from the Constitutional and traditional American values that it is obscene for them to claim them or accuse others of lacking.


DS


The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Video of the Day - Burger King Chicken Fry

I laughed out loud and woke my girlfriend up when I saw this:



DS

New Banned Items on Airplanes

The Deseret News has the story. Banned items include:

• All beverages
• Shampoo
• Suntan lotion
• Creams
• Toothpaste
• Hair gels
• All items of similar consistency to those mentioned above.

Because, you know, you might have a bomb in your Shampoo bottle. Anyone ever get the feeling that the people in charge of security are more interested in meaningless, ostentatious displays than actually protecting us?

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Read Bosses Email - Get 15 years?

PCWorld has the story about a Utah man charged with reading his bosses email.

If convicted, Dobson faces a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and restitution to the victims.

Wow. That's about what you get for manslaughter, isn't it?

DS

Orrin Hatch - Ever Eager to Shaft the Little Guy

I saw this over at Utah Politics. KCPW has a piece, and of course, Slashdot is reporting as well.

From ZDNET:

"Specifically, it would shift to a "first to file" method of awarding patents, which is already used in most foreign countries, instead of the existing "first to invent" standard, which has been criticized as complicated to prove. Such a change has already earned backing from Jon Dudas, chief of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office."

Of course, the consequences of this mean that larger corporations can steal the inventions of smaller inventors much more easily. They have the resources and set mechanisms to file patents quickly. Going through the process can cost up to $15,000 and even if a small inventor can put that together, it's likely that they will get beat to the punch.

It would also curb the amount of damages for winners of infringement suits. Perhaps most notably, and in a departure from the House version, courts would have to calculate the royalties owed by infringers based solely on the economic value of the "novel and nonobvious features" covered by the disputed patent, not on the value of the product as a whole.

I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I loathe patent farms, where a firm will acquire hundreds of patents and then sue as many people as possible. However, the solution to this isn't to lower infringement claims but to limit the time length of a patent, raise the bar for what can be patented, and do away with so-called "business method" and software patents entirely. The reason they have opted for this approach, is because it allows large corporations to continue locking up intellectual property unfairly while shutting the patent farms out of the game.

The Professional Inventors Alliance, a group representing independent American inventors, blasted the proposal, saying it amounts to a "wish list" for "antipatent, washed-up tech companies" and would water down protections for individual inventors.

Boo Hoo,
professional Investors Alliance. Screwing you and your ilk over is the only part of the bill I like.

Large corporations want it both ways: they don't want to be liable for anything, but they want control. That Hatch is once again selling out the little guy in favor of big business is, of course, unsurprising.

This will pass with flying colors. Once the largest money interests are satisfied, there is really nothing that can stop it.

Other good views on Computerworld.

Google >>

DS

Opinion - Steve Russell

Better energy policy needed
So, we have high gas prices due to Katrina, problems in the Middle East and now a corroded pipeline in Alaska. All of this is nonsense.
We have high gas precisely because we don't have an energy policy that makes any kind of sense. America can now be held hostage by anyone who is willing to drill for oil.
All of our energy problems can be laid squarely at the feet of politicians and environmentalists, both local and national, who have refused to address the reality that we need more energy production in the form of nuclear, natural gas and oil, in order to keep the American economy running. It is because these people are hungry for political power. We, the electorate, are to blame as well. We allow this to go on election after election.
The bottom line is — the wrong people are holding public office and need to be replaced with candidates who can see further than the next election. I fear we may be in for a very long, energy-expensive future unless we come to our senses soon.

Steve Russell
Centerville

We have the most oil-friendly Administration and Congress we may have ever seen. They've been there for long enough and had the majority to take our energy policy any direction they want. They haven't. Why? Environmentalist? Are you kidding? Environmentalists hold almost no power right now, and haven't for quite some time.

Mr. Russel is right about one thing, though: Katrina, corroded pipelines (which were supposedly maintained with all of those oil profits), and Middle East turmoil have almost nothing to do with the real cost of oil. However, the supply/demand dynamic is not the problem, either.

This isn't about political power, it's about money. Oil and Gas companies have zero interest in suppressing the cost of gas and other forms of energy. Anything that happens is a reason for prices to go up; nothing that happens is a reason for prices to come down except the sour mood of the public.

Destroying the environment in the pursuit of more oil will not suppress gas prices. We have to find alternatives, diversify the money interests which control them, and improve the efficiency in which we utilize them.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Opinion - West C. Hammond

No more rocky roads
Well, it will be a smooth road from now on. No more "between a rock and hard place." There won't be any rocks. Good-bye to good old Rocky.

West C. Hammond
West Jordan

How clever. It will not be a "smooth road." The divisive dynamics which operate in Utah were not caused by Rocky Anderson, and will not be alleviated by his absence.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Opinion - Diane Kelley

Gibson's rant was justified
Eugene Robinson's Sunday column was titled "Gibson's ugly rant was classic anti-Semitism."
I think Gibson's ugly rant was a sign of classic frustration at being targeted by the left — unrelentingly, including many in the Jewish community. He has been a favorite target of the left because he has been seen as a conservative, Catholic Christian with seven children, who promotes old-fashioned values like valor and courage and patriotism in some of his movies.
They never stop trouncing him — from Susan Sarandon's disparaging comments, to the media's ballyhooing that his movie "Braveheart" was violent, which was so aggravating and disingenuous, and on and on. For the left to complain about violence in a movie is almost unheard of except for that particular movie. When I saw "Braveheart," I was so appreciative that in the battle scenes the violence depicted was so brief that you knew what happened — someone getting killed or maimed — but they didn't dwell on the scenes They were a flash. But Hollywood howled. Amazing. It was not the violence they were really howling about, but the morals taught — that family and country and freedom are worth fighting and even dying for.

Diane Kelley
Bluffdale

Wait.. Let me get this straight: Ms. Kelley contends that Mel Gibson's anti-Semitic rant was caused by the frustration arises out of the attacks on the left? Or more specifically, because some decried the violence of the movie?

Wow. This whole Mel Gibson thing has driven some people insane. Are people so invested in the Christian image of Mel Gibson that they have to construct these ridiculous justifications for his rant?

He has been a favorite target of the left because he has been seen as a conservative, Catholic Christian with seven children, who promotes old-fashioned values like valor and courage and patriotism in some of his movies.

*blinks* Because as we all know, the left hates Catholics, Christians, children, valor, courage and patriotism?

...to the media's ballyhooing that his movie "Braveheart" was violent

Uh.. I loved Braveheart, but it was violent. Are you kidding me? I've never seen so many legs lopped off, throats slit, etc. But the bigger point is, Braveheart was extremely popular, received rave reviews, and grossed over 200 million dollars worldwide.

It was not the violence they were really howling about, but the morals taught — that family and country and freedom are worth fighting and even dying for.

Okay, someone needs a nap. Ms. Kelley, take a deep breath, and consider the possibility that people who decry violence in cinema don't necessarily do so because they hate all that is holy and pure. Besides, you may have missed the memo, but the conservative line isn't that freedom is worth dying for, it's that safety is worth surrending freedom.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Polygamists Getting Indignant in Utah

CORRECTION: The Rally will happen on the 19th of August, not today. Thanks to Stenar for the correction.

Between 100 and 300 polygamists are expected to rally at the Salt Lake City/County building today. Apparently, we're all judging them too harshly.

From the Tribune:

"Sixteen children, ranging in age from 10 to 19, are slated to speak at the rally, though they will not be disclosing which group they belong to. The rally will also feature a youth band and free snow cones."

Free snow cones! Sweet. I'm there.

"I'm your brother and your friend no matter who you are or where you come from and I won't judge you," said Christian, 19, in a press release announcing the rally. "Can you say the same about me?"

No. Here's the thing, Christian... There seems to be an awful lot of bad things that happen inside polygamist circles. A disproportionately high number of child abuse, welfare fraud, etc. Is that just because it's not out in the open? Is the disapproval of society contributing to these dynamics? If not, it seems there may be a fundamental and systemic problem with polygamy. But hey, let's get it out in the open and discuss it.

DS

Italians Beat the Crap out of Utah Tourist Chasing Thieves

Fox News has more on this. Apparently, if you get robbed in Italy, the locals get very angry if you try to get your property back. Fortunately the muggers were caught, and the police are trying to identify the residents who mobbed our Utah brother.

DS

Lieberman Loses Democratic Primary: Asserts Voters are Losers, will run Anyway

Sen. Joe Lieberman lost the Democratic Primary to Ned Lamont. In typical fashion, Joe has decided that the voters didn't really mean it, and intends to run for the Senate as an "independent Democrat", whatever the hell that is.

Google >>

For any sitting Senator to lose a primary or an election is pretty amazing. With a 98% reelection rate for incumbents, Lieberman has to be kicking himself for hitching his star to President Bush's wagon.

He knew this loss was a possibility, and for a while now has been alluding to running as an independent because he just has this "fundamental belief" that he can serve his state better than any other Democrat or Republican. Clearly the voters don't think so, Joe.

Viva la Lamont.

DS

Slow Updates

We apologize for the slow updates. We're shifting a few things around and getting ready to move to a dedicated server. Hang in there!

DS

Congress: No Money for you, U.N.

CNN has the story.

Hyde and his supporters argued the financial threat gives some teeth to the U.N. reform bill and asserts Congress' constitutional "power of the purse."

If only Hyde and his supporters trumpeted the "power of the purse" when dealing with the Executive branch. But I guess cutting off money to the U.N... asserts... their... Constitutional responsibility.. Oh God. This depresses the hell out of me.

DS

Political Spyglass - Six More Years for Hatch

There's a good post over at the Political Spyglass on the ever-out-of-touch Orrin Hatch. Don't agree with all of his views, but it's a good piece about how sometimes, a Senator just needs to hang his hat up.

DS

Video of the Day - Lobbyist Undercover

How awkward.



DS

Opinion - Ryan Larsen - URDA Recipient

Why we should care
A Deseret Morning News editorial (Aug. 2) begins, "Should people care what Mel Gibson thinks about Jews? Yes, they should."
I ask whether people should care what U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan thinks of Jews. One man blamed Jews for "all the wars in the world." The other man said that an Israeli attack on a U.N. post was "apparently deliberate."
The former was drunk.
The latter was sober.
The former issued a profuse apology.
The latter demanded a joint role in Israel's investigation.
The former may have lost his career.
The latter is largely unscathed.
Should people care what Kofi Annan thinks of Jews? Yes, they should.

Ryan Larsen
Salt Lake City

I thought I was misreading this letter until I saw Ryan Larsen had written it. Then I rolled my eyes and started typing.

I hope Mr. Larsen didn't sprain a muscle reaching to tie Mel Gibson's anti-Semitic remarks to Kofi Annan's response to Israel blowing up U.N. officials. It takes a special someone to attempt such an elaborate and reaching comparison, but Mr. Larsen stepped up to the plate.

Are the Israeli's so pure, so innocent, that the "apparently deliberate" remark is now considered rabidly anti-Semitic? The worst you could accuse Annan of is some kind of speculative impropriety but frankly, it doesn't seem ridiculous he would be angry and suspicious. When Israel is informed over and over about the existence of a U.N. station, and then they blow it up, doesn't that make you wonder, Mr. Larsen?

Partisan extremists always do this when someone on "their side" is exposed doing something stupid: they quickly forgive them and immediately attack an enemy for something similar. Mr. Larsen, apparently faced with a dearth of anti-Semitic progressives, needed an enemy, and needed one quick.

For his mesmerizing efforts, he wins our weekly Unsinkable Rubber Ducky Award. Most self-righteous "culture warriors" are candidates for this award. It is issued to people who appear to be so polarized and invested in their particular ideology that they are incapable of acknowledging information unflattering to their belief system.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

There's Only So Much You Can Blame On Alcohol, Mr. Gibson

The Deseret News published a great piece by Eugene Robinson about Mel Gibson's anti-Semitic rant. It's all over the net, too. It reiterates a point we mentioned before:

You might blame the alcohol for revealing you as an anti-Semite, but you can't blame it for turning you into one. I've witnessed a lot of drunken tirades, some of them extraordinarily bizarre, but I've never seen them generate a spontaneous stable of radical opinion.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Casino Charity and the Endangered Devil's Hole Pupfish

Somebody, who we think lives in the Netherlands, drew this rendition of the Pupfish:

The Mandalay Bay Casino, ever eager to give back some of the hundreds of millions they bilk from the general populace, are attempting to save the endagered pupfish.

We interviewed a random guy who passed our house about the dwindling pupfish population:


"Thank you for sitting down with us to discuss this very important issue."

"uh.. No problem, man."

"So, Mark.. May we call you Mark?"

"My name's Steve, dude."

"Okay, good enough. What do you think about the Mandalay Bay Casino's efforts to save the
Pupfish, Mark?"

"It's Steve, Dude."

"Steve. Sorry. So?"

"Well, I support it, I guess. I mean, if it's endangered and all."

"Steve, do you know what a Pupfish is?"

*laughs* "No, dude. What is it?"

"Um. Well, it's a puppy that has gills, so it can stay under water for a long time."

"Dude! No way."

"Way!"

"Dude."

"I know."

*laughs* "Dude, you're f**king with me, right?"

"No way, dude. I know, it's totally weird, 'cause we hadn't heard of it either."

"I don't know, dude. But I gotta go. My lady's waiting for her coffee."

"Alright. Well Mark, thanks for sharing your views with us."

"No problem. And it's Steve, dude."

"We understand." *winks and does hand quotes* “Steve.

*laughs* “Whatever, man.”


You can enlarge this picture of a Pupfish and color it.

DS

No Pupfish/Pedestrian were harmed in the writing of this piece. I mean, obviously. There are only like 35 Pupfish's left in the whole friggin' world. We doubt one of them is going to wander down our street, and we're way too lazy to go to them.

News from the Beehive State (Utah)

A little after 10pm last night, my girlfriend and I were taking the long way home to avoid the police check points. As we passed the 7-11 near our home, we noticed several police cars. Little did we know it was because someone had showed up there after being stabbed. Apparently, if you're stabbed in Utah, you should go immediately to the nearest convenience store. (We're kidding. Go to the hospital or call 911, bozo!)

.....

Speaking of police check points, officers issued 93 citations last night, including 7 DUI's. Memo to people with non-compliant cars and/or drinking problems: when you see that big sign that says "police checkpoint" up ahead... You know what? Just keep driving. We're sure they'll let you through without incident.

.....

Elsewhere, a man turned a pipe bomb into the police, prompting them to release this no-brainer statement:
"They say if you find a pipe bomb it's best just to not touch it and call 9-1-1."
Hear that, people? If you find a bomb, don't fiddle with it and don't take it with you. It makes me sad that this needs to be said. These are the type of people who become recipients of the Darwin Award.

....

Not really Utah related, but Paris Hilton is now claiming she's celibate. Right, Paris. Why is this news? ... Why are we reporting on it? ... We just answered our own question. God we're typical media whores.

Google >>

....

KSL sac's up and reports on a former employee and his associate who now wants to have child porn charges against them dropped. I'm starting to like KSL more and more.

....

The Deseret Morning News is reporting that alcohol sales are up 62%. No word yet on whether Utah's we-know-what's-best-for-you majority will be formulating legislation to stop this frightening trend. I don't even drink and Utah alcohol laws piss me off. I'm so cranky.

....

Tim McGraw and his wife, what's her name, held a concert last night. A sharp increase in Cowboy-Hat sightings was reported down at the Gateway immediately prior to the concert.


DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Weekly Roundup of Salt Lake Global Warming News and Opinion

DESERET MORNING NEWS:
As usual, the Deseret Morning News presented a mixed bag, allowing the ostrich farmers (those who encourage others to keep their heads in the sand on this issue) ready access to their opinion pages. Still, a couple of reality-based articles found print.

Monday
Allen S. Thorpe, a Castle Dale ostrich farmer, thinks humans evolved to befoul the Earth, but offers no computer models or statistical analyses to support his claim.

Wednesday
Denver Post article: Vail Resorts initiate 100% wind power energy offset.

Thursday
DMN opinion editors see global warming as just another in the list of Rocky “the tire biter” Anderson’s list of worthy causes.

Friday
Another ostrich farmer, Ambrose Putnam of Magna, babbles about coal-fired power plants, oil refineries and, by cracky, the American way!

Saturday
G. Don Gale, erstwhile KSL editorial director, lists the Bush administration’s purposeful denial of GW science as one of many reasons Utahans should abandon support for this president

Sunday
Dennis Lythgoe gives Al Gore’s book, An Inconvenient Truth, a rave review.


SALT LAKE TRIBUNE:
The Tribune continues to take this issue seriously. No evidence of enduring debate present in these pages. Today’s edition kicks off a weeklong series highlighting the science and bringing local focus to the implications.

I would like to think this weekly roundup inspired the Trib’s decision to produce this series – I ain’t sayin’ it’s so, I’m just sayin’ I’d like to think that. Alas, this behind-the-scenes preview podcast dashes that dream.

Tuesday
Citing his personal and personable crusade to educate the masses on the climate crisis, Tribune Media Services columnist (and former executive director of ACLU, Utah) Robyn Blumner makes a strong case for re-electing Al Gore in 2006.

Wednesday
Holladay’s Thomas O. Breitling notes that the greenhouse gas emissions problem encompasses more than just fossil fuels.

LA Times columnist Eugene Linden: whether GW climate changes occur suddenly or incrementally, the time to act is now.

Friday
Exploring various GW scenarios predicting the winners and losers among Utah's wildlife.

Saturday
Orlando Sentinel columnist Kathleen Parker concludes her anti-anti-Christianist apologia on the Bush love affair with end-of-times evangelicals by claiming, “If they said Revelation predicted global warming, Gore would take their money too!” [paraphrased quotation].

Sunday
Citing conflicting and localized anecdotal evidence as the primary reason public opinion has yet to gain the consensus shared among genuine climate scientists, reporter Judy Fahys announces a weeklong series on GW, focusing on potential ramifications in Utah.

Although addressing a heat wave rather than GW, per se, Garrison Keillor suggests some frightening (but hilarious) effects.

High Country News contributor Allen Best discusses age-old patterns of aridity throughout the Southwest, and the effects of shorter winters on Lake Powell.

Wall Street Journal article traces anti-Gore YouTube.com video to D.C. lobbying firm representing Big Oil.

And finally, from beyond the Wasatch Front: just when you were certain some people would never get it … that legendary Christo-fascist wingnut Pat Robertson jumps in front of a camera and says this.

Labels:

Reminder: Check Point Tonight

KSL has the story.

They'll be at 3rd West between 1050 and 13th South. I understand what they're trying to do, but frankly, I don't like being pulled over unless there is a good reason. This "only the guilty have something to fear" mentality sprouting up across the country is dangerous.

DS

Video of the Day - Unexpected Message to Girlfriend

Ouch.





DS

Jobs, Stocks, and Supply-Side Mythology

An Associated Press report in this morning’s DMN, “Job news fails to buoy stocks,” exposes a few of truths about Bush’ economic policies. The article begins with this telling statement:

Wall Street got what it wanted Friday — Labor Department data showing slower job growth

It’s not about job growth as an indicator of increasing productivity needs. Neither is it about payroll as an increasing drain on profits. It’s about inflation. Specifically, fears that the Fed will continue to raise commercial bankers’ interest rates.

We all recall Bush’s sales pitch for his massive tax cuts for the rich: putting more money in the coffers of investors fuels the entire economy.

Call it trickle-down, supply-side, Reaganomics, Hoovernomics, or just plain foolish, this isn’t the first time we’ve tried this economic approach. Nor is this the first time it has failed to do much of anything beyond increasing the unconscionable gap between the wealthy owners of industry and those who actually make the wheels turn beneath them.

This chart relating CEO compensation to stock prices, corporate profits and worker pay tells the story. Notice the remarkable relationship between CEO pay and stock prices. On the lower end, note the unmistakable connection between worker pay and inflation. Overall, just try to find any relationship whatsoever between the pay trends of workers and CEOs.

So …where’s the trickle?

The chart referenced above belies one of the basic claims of Bush’s economic policy: tax relief for the wealthy allows them to invest more in businesses, which leads to increased profitability, more jobs, and higher wages for the average American worker. Bullshit! The only driver that seems to have any influence on wages is inflation, pure and simple. But even this masks the fact that the federal minimum continues to lag well behind.

One letter in today’s DMN Readers’ Forum, written by Brian Barrow of Midvale, included this demonstrably ignorant response to the idea of raising the national minimum wage:

The reason companies are formed is to make money. If those companies have to pay their employees more, they will be forced to compensate by raising prices.

I wish Mr. Barrow and his fellow drinkers of the supply-side Kool-aid would take a long, hard look at the chart linked above, and tell us again that raising prices is the only option companies have to offset a desperately needed minimum wage increase.

The undeniable, and repeatedly demonstrated truth is that the trickle-down theory is flawed from the outset. Short of desire-inspiring marketing campaigns, increased supply rarely spurs increased demand. The natural course of things is that demand precedes supply.

Surprisingly, a DMN editorial in today’s edition indicates that their editorial board may be sensitive to reality after all. The piece begins with this reference to an all-too-typical Republican spin job:

This newspaper recently quoted the leader of the Legislature's new conservative caucus, Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Draper, as saying the extra revenues coming to the state these days don't represent a surplus.

"The real name should be that taxpayers overpaid," he said.


Overpaid? For what? Did we fully fund all necessary programs prior to making this assessment?

The editorial goes on to point out that the tax-cutting zeal exhibited by Rep. Hughes and his economic bedmates is too often realized at the expense of our social safety net, and concludes with this observation:

Tax cuts also are important. A lower income-tax rate would help attract business and would allow Utahns to keep more of what they earn, thus stimulating the economy further.

But responsible stewards understand that the people's government should take care of its basic
responsibilities before trimming its revenues. That's easier to do when money is rolling in than when coffers are dry, but it can happen only when lawmakers begin speaking of it as a priority.


To be more precise, they might have said, “Tax cuts are important, provided they are designed to realize the goals they are intended to accomplish.” Also, “allow lower and middle-income Utahns to keep more of what they earn, thus properly stimulating the demand side of the economic equation.”

Still, give them props for placing “basic responsibilities” above tax cuts.

And just how long might we expect this so-called “taxpayer overpayment” money to continue rolling in? According to the president, our economy is “strong.” He often uses the words “expanding” and “robust.” Is it really?

Returning to the AP report, July’s total of 113,000 new jobs, down significantly from June’s 121,000 and well shy of the 145,000 predicted by economists. What are economists saying about this? The article quotes chief economist for vFinance Investments, Ken McCarthy:

“I do think there's an element of concern that maybe what this employment report might be telling us is that the economy is weaker than we thought. Not just slowing down but actually weak.”

Additionally:

Some [economists] noted that a pause [in the trend toward increased Fed interest rates] also means the economy has indeed slowed down, which could affect corporate earnings in the coming months.

Robust, indeed!

The bottom line: too much of whatever economic growth is occurring right now is focused at the top. They’ve gotten their “tax relief,” in spades, and the rest of us are struggling to deal with the fallout. And yet, they continue to call for more. Too much is never enough with these people. The “haves” segment of Bush’s self-proclaimed base will always push for ways to gain inclusion in that other segment: the “have mores.”

We simply cannot afford to continue electing these misguided supply-siders to local and national office.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Labels:

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison - Ballsiest Woman we Know


The Republicans tactic on attaching rich-people-tax-breaks to higher-wages-for-poor-people failed. Great. Anyway, look at the cajones on Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison:

It is an excuse to make it a do-nothing Congress,” Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Republican of Texas, said. “And we are turning our back on the middle-class and poor people in this country who depend on the minimum wage and death-tax relief.”



Yes, Senator. All those poor and middle-class are just dying for death-tax relief. Actually, as the darling Senator from the great state of Texas knows, the estate tax only effects the very wealthy. But it takes some guts to just belt that out with a straight face.

"What poor people really need is for rich people to get more tax breaks..." (just for clarification, this wasn't said by the Senator.)

Been there, done that, didn't work.

DS

Opinion - Kirby Cook

Who casts smoke vote?
The billboard said 80 percent of Utahns favor banning smoking in bars and private clubs. Wow! Eight out of 10 Utahns frequent bars and private clubs? Who'da thought it? No, wait. Maybe it means 80 percent of Utahns want smoking banned — in places they never go.

Kirby Cook
Saratoga Springs



Haha.. Can you imagine a Christian pundit saying something like "Well, we Christians don't do that, but we fully support the rights of others to choose their own path. After all, we don't have a monopoly on the truth." Hahahahaha.. Ahh... *sigh* I crack myself up.


DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Opinion - David Jensen

Rocky's decision good news
Finally. Good news on the front page of the Morning News: "Rocky rules out third term as mayor." I left California several years ago because of ultraliberal politicians like Anderson. It has always been a mystery how conservative Utah could elect and then re-elect someone who doesn't come close to sharing the values, standards and political beliefs of the majority of the people.

David Jensen
Alpine
Yes... It is indeed a mystery. It hurts my brain to try and comprehend... I mean.. How could he be re-elected? I... I... just don't know. Perhaps... by a majority? But no! If that was true.. It'd be.. It'd almost be as though a majority of the people felt he shared their values, standards and political beliefs.. Why... that would mean that Mr. Jensen is... Wrong.... and a just a little bit weird for not getting it.

Of course, there's a third option: He got elected by the Utah minority to piss off the Utah majority. In any event, I really feel for the Utah majority. I mean come on.. They've been so conciliatory and sensitive to the feelings of the minority. That they tolerate our mere existence is a testament to their benevolence. Utah Majority, I salute you.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Opinion - James A. Marples

Punish Gibson for violations
There have been widespread news reports of actor Mel Gibson spouting slurs of hatred against Jews after he was arrested for speeding and driving under the Influence. People have speculated about whether his career has been damaged. It is a shame that most of the debate centers on Mr. Gibson's unfortunate comments and not on the violations he concedes having committed.
He should be fined for the speeding, face a bit of jail time for any DUI violation and should be sentenced to many weeks of community service. Violations are violations.
If he is a bigot, that is another matter. Freedom of thought isn't punishable. Mr. Gibson should either admit it and live with it or make voluntary acts of contrition. Furthermore, the Screen Actors Guild should decide if it will assess any sanctions upon him. If he were to donate two years of royalty income to a Jewish charity, it would show he's serious about making amends.

James A. Marples
Provo

Yes, because if there's one way to judge whether a celebrity is repentant or not, it's to see if they're willing to buy their way out of trouble.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Opinion - Ambrose Putnam

The Deseret Morning News

Conservation not solution
The Deseret Morning News editorial "Time for Utah to trim lights" (July 28) was yet another shrill voice of defeatism and surrender. While conservation is acceptable as a short-term solution during emergencies, it's not a long-term solution for America.
For decades we've led the world in establishing the highest standard of living ever known. Are we expected to adopt a lesser standard of living in order to pander to the lunatic fringe in our society who say the sky is falling?
The answer is to increase the supply of energy. Build more coal and nuclear power plants, as well as oil refineries. Let's stop whining and again start acting like Americans.

Ambrose Putnam
Magna

Hear that, all you friggin' sissy-girl liberals? Grab a steak, a beer, some plutonium and a lump of coal, shut your hole, and sac up to the American way of life.

What is the American way of life? Apparently, it's burning the world to the ground so that we don't have to interrupt our voracious appetites.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Opinion - David Jensen (of the Triple-C Club)

Deseret Morning News
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,640199744,00.html


Rocky's decision good news
Finally. Good news on the front page of the Morning News: "Rocky rules out third term as
mayor." I left California several years ago because of ultraliberal politicians like Anderson. It has always been a mystery how conservative Utah could elect and then re-elect someone who doesn't come close to sharing the values, standards and political beliefs of the majority of the people.
David Jensen

Alpine


This letter is interesting in many respects. First, we have here a member of the Triple-C Club: Confessed Conservative Cowards. Rather than stand his ground in California and fight for his “values, standards and political beliefs,” he turned tail and ran to Utah – indeed, Utah County! – where he doubtlessly found sufficient like-minded numbers to quell his timorous soul.

Watch out, Mr. Jensen ... we genuine, unapologetic, stand-up liberals are like Visa: we're everywhere you want to be!

Second, the writer, like so many of the mayor’s most vocal and venomous critics, lives well outside the boundaries of Salt Lake City.

Third, he seems to believe that the capitol city mayor is elected by a majority of ballots cast throughout the entire state. To be fair, we should recognize that this seeming misunderstanding may well result from an editorial hack job, of the sort we have demonstrated elsewhere and will continue document in the future.

Incidentally, the Triple-C club is quite an exclusive set. Most potential inductees, including almost every member of the Bush administration and their chickenhawk neo-con allies, fail admission for lack of even enough courage to own up to the blatant cowardice (and hypocrisy) of their actions.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Video of the Day - Sweet Electricty

I love this kind of stuff:




DS

Okay people. The Bush Administration isn't even slowing down.

This is a big deal.

The Bush administration, stung by the Hamdan decision, is now drafting legislation to be passed by Congress which would actually expand the authority of Military Tribunals. Here are some key points:

  • Defendants would not be guaranteed the right to be present at their own trials
  • They will not be able to see evidence against them
  • Hearsay would be admissible
  • They will not be able to confront accusers
  • Evidence obtained through illegal means wouldn't be a bad thing (and perfectly admissable)
  • No right to a speedy or public trial would be given
  • The Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld) would be allowed to unilaterally add any charges he wished
  • Oh yeah, not just al qaeda or other terrorists are subject to these rules.

Check out these great quotes from the Washinton Post:

"We know you're guilty. We can't tell you why, but there's a guy, we can't tell you who, who told us something. We can't tell you what, but you're guilty."

Would this be an oppressive regimes wet dream or what?

John Yoo ... said the drafters were obviously "trying to return the law to where it was before Hamdan " by writing language into the draft that challenges key aspects of the court's decision.

Why do we even have a Judicial branch?

It gives the secretary (Rumsfeld) the unilateral right to "specify other violations of the laws of war that may be tried by military commission." The secretary would be empowered to prescribe detailed procedures for carrying out the trials, including "modes of proof" and the use of hearsay evidence.

Meet Donald Rumsfeld, new shadowy dictator of America.

The U.S. official countered that a military judge "would look hard" at the origins of such evidence and that defendants would have to count on "the trustworthiness of the system."

*blinks* What? ....Are you friggin' kidding me? Blow me, unnamed U.S. official! What "trust capital" do you think you have to trade? At every turn, in every environment, the government has obscured the truth or outright lied. Nothing they predicted has come to pass. Every reassurance has passed into history. You're asking for us to trust you now? The nerve of these people is astounding.

*takes deep breath*

When will we not let this happen? At what point will we and our representatives stand up and say "this isn't okay" and do something? We need a government which doesn't blame freedom whenever something horrible happens. We need an administration who can say "We will be safe AND free, and anyone who says it's one or the other is a coward or a tyrant."

Google >>

DS

Rocky Inspires on Radio West Today

"A culture of obedience is a very dangerous place."

--Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson

Mayor Rocky Anderson joined Doug Fabrizio during the final half hour of this morning’s Radio West program on KUER (90.1 fm). The mayor had some interesting (and inspiring) things to say about his decision not to seek a third term, his passion for his causes and perceived mission in life, and the “real Rocky” vis-à-vis the caricature created by particular members of the local media.

As usual, Rocky didn’t pull any punches. Contending that the Deseret News has routinely “lied” about his positions, he likened dealing with DMN reporters to “living in a Kafka novel with a little Taliban thrown in.” Neither does the good mayor bear much love for the Standard Examiner.

The program will be re-aired on KUER at 7:00 pm tonight. An MP3 audio recording of this program is also available KUER's web site. Rocky joins the program at about the 30 minute mark.

Bam, Rumsfeld! Clinton don't LIKE yu, yo incompetan' punk

Senator Clinton sticks it to the Sec. of Defense:



DS

Obituary - Peter Gray

Salt Lake Tribune Obituary

Peter Gray - May we all live with as much purpose

DS

Video of the Day - Lizard Attack

Look at this guy try to recover from being a woosie. (Of course, I'd freak out if it happened to me, too..)





DS

Utah, Wal-Mart and Eminent Domain

When the Supreme Court ruled that government could use the power of eminent domain to take property for private development, I was ashamed of the liberal judges sitting on the bench who pushed it through. Fortunately, many state governments have passed legislation prohibiting the practice, including Utah.

But then again... Some cities are seeking to "tweak" the law so that they can do this. The impetus behind this newfound faith in the government-to-do-the-right-thing-so-let's-hand-them-oodles-of-power? Wal-Mart. Ogden wants some residents to clear the hell out so that Wal-Mart can come on in.

Über-wealthy corporations and family dynasties love this sort of thing; the government becomes their tool to circumvent the property rights of those without the power to fight it. It's bad and the precedent it sets is downright frightening.

To hell with Wal-Mart and their low, low prices.

DS

Deseret Spectacle Tag Cloud


It makes me sad how big Mel Gibson's name is. Argh! There it is again. *sigh*

DS

Whatever happened to New Orleans?

If this is real, it's disturbing.

DS

Mel Gibson. Oh, and other news.

Some goings on:

Democrats are feebly what little power they have by refusing to lift a "hold" on a FDA nomination.

Google >>

Castro turning power over to his brother, "Raul", now being called a "test run." As we all know, the best indication of whether someone will be a good dictator for life, is to give them that authority for one day, with them knowing it will soon be yanked from them.

Google >>

Mel Gibson 24/7 continues today. News organizations have now moved into stage 3 (after shock and delight) and are now offering all kinds of help and advice. Barbara Walters is even pissed, and that's saying something. The San Francisco Chronicle asks the question everyone else rightly thinks is too stupid a question to ask: "Can we be mad at Israel, but not hate the Jews?"
BlogHer, ever quick to forgive and forget, asks "Mel Gibson: Is apologizing for being a racist bigot enough?" Some have moved onto stage 4, otherwise known as "the story is dying, let's milk it by providing meaningless historical context", while others blame the highway itself for Mel's troubles.

Google >>

In news that makes me smile like a giddy schoolgirl, Rambus suffered a major defeat in their patent battles.

Google >>

Chris is probably going to go ahead and become a hurricane. Bitch.

Google >>

Rowlings sad but relieved at finishing the Harry Potter epic.

Google >>

The auto industry continues to make us all sad.

Google >>

Blogger fought the Federal Judge, and the Federal Judge won.

Google >>

Oh, and Joy Behar wants to cut Mel Gibsons penis off.


DS

Stay in on Friday

SLC Police Plan Checkpoint for Friday
KSL has the story.

"Police plan to pull over all vehicles traveling on 300 West between 1050 South and 1300 South this Friday and Saturday between ten p-m and three a-m."

Eek. I'll be avoiding that area on Friday.

DS

Video of the Day - Trunk Monkey - Car Thief

Sometimes, you need a monkey to get rid of the evidence.



DS

James A. Marshall & CODA

Early last month, we posted a reply to an opinion piece encouraging everyone to become organ donors. Earlier this afternoon, I got a notice that a new comment had been left on an old article. Being the jaded hack that I am, I immediately suspected comment spam and sent the author a "what are your intentions?" e-mail. It wasn't until he responded that I noticed he had replied to our post on organ donors. Probably not comment spam. Don't I look like an ass. (That's rhetorical. No need to confirm. That means you, Theorris)

Anyway, I've decided to republish his comments here so that more might read them. I've only done cursory research of his organization. It's brand new and has hardly any presence on the net, but it seems legit. Do your own research before you contribute to any organization - but from what I've seen, it's legitimate and a worthy cause.

His blog can be found here and his website, here.

My Heart Transplant

My blog will take you through my personal experience of having a heart transplant. It will show the importance of organ donation. It will give guidance in case you or a loved one have to go through the transplant experience.

If the averages held, on the day I received my new heart 18 other people died somewhere in the U.S. because there wasn't a heart, kidney, liver or other organ available to save them. That makes me a very lucky guy.

I now have a chance to see my first two grandchildren this year. Both my daughter and my daughter-in-law are pregnant. Even more importantly my father, who has inoperable pancreatic cancer, has a chance to see his first two great granchildren before he dies.

What do you do when you have been blessed with a second chance in life? That's an individual decision for everyone. I decided to organize CODA. The aim is to provide financial help to the less fortunate for the cost of prescription drugs and medical costs. It also awards scholarships to young organ recipients to help them with school costs. It is a 501 (c)(3) charity so financial contributions are deductible according to state and federal law.

Organ recipients have to take anti-rejection drugs for the rest of their life. If they don't, they will die. Many people cannot afford the costs involved in a transplant. Through CODA I'm trying to help. You can visit our website at www.codacharity.org.

Don't be intimidated by the "Make a Donation" button. It's not asking for you to donate an organ. It merely takes you to "Paypal" if you'd like to make a secure tax-deductible charitable contribution via the Internet. Thanks and I hope you enjoy reading about my personal experience.

Any day is a great day for a patient to receive a transplant, but to receive my heart on Valentine's Day, 2004 is very special to me and my family.

If you're not a donor, we'd like to again encourage you to become one. More information can be found here.

DS

Robert Miller - A platform to stand on

Early on in Deseret Spectacle history, we posted a short piece entitled "Rob Miller - Making me Sad." We know what you're thinking: "What an incredibly pithy title." We know. In any event, we poked fun at Mr. Miller for having nothing listed under his platform. Since Democrats are now poised to take over Utah politics, we thought we'd bring you an update:

He's got a platform!

Yay!

Unfortunately, his bio is still as barren as the Utah Salt Flats, but things are happenin', people. Things are HAP-PEN-NIN'.



Robert Miller, we salute you!

DS

Crazy Weather


Anybody else notice this crazy weather of ours? There are reports out for street flooding and major wind damage. Keep your eyes open.

DS

One last Mel Gibson funny

After this, I swear I'll wait as long as I can stand it before posting something Mel Gibson again:

Apparently, Mel Gibson was in talks to direct a mini-series on the Holocaust with ABC. The Holocaust? What the hell would Mel Gibson want to do a mini-series on the Holcaust? Needless to say, he's now lost the deal, since apparently people are skeptical he would give it fair treatment after his anti-Semitic tirade.

What a crazy dude.

DS

Mel Gibson Mug Shot


You dolt, Mel.

DS

Morning Round-up

Israel wants to clear out more area in advance of international forces showing up at the scene. Why do they need international forces then?

Google >>

Favorite religious nut job Mel Gibson continues to generate a buzz:

Google >>

Lots of people throwing the word "massacre" around. The word "Lebanon" seems to be used at the same time.

Google >>

Fidel Castro temporarily hands over power to brother, "Raul" Raul immediately orders gold statue of himself and declares himself awesomest guy of Cuba.

Google >>

Police tried to cover up Gibson's arrest? Thank God they didn't succeed.

Google >>

The Senate votes to limit debate on offshore drilling, as on this particular issue, plenty of study has been done.

Google >>

US to ban access to Social Networking sites in schools and libraries, because, you know, that's the problem:

Google >>

No doubt there'll be more lunacy to come as the day presses on. As always, we'll be here to make fun of it as it happens.

DS

Yes, I wrote that letter in today's DMN ... sort of.

Deseret Morning News
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,640198972,00.html

What's proportionate?
Like Kyle Williams (Reader's Forum, July 31), I roll my eyes at the lately fashionable
word, "disproportionate." But my disdain arises from the fact that it is too easy to misinterpret. As Williams notes, sending one policeman to apprehend one bank robber would be ridiculously ineffective. A "reasonably proportionate" response might range from a few officers to a SWAT
team. Given the current and historical facts involved in the Israel-Hezbollah conflict, a proportionate response — using Williams' robbery analogy — might involve a SWAT team.
Robert Hammer

Salt Lake City

Wow. Sort of makes me sound like I am arguing in favor of Israel taking the broadest, strongest possible response, doesn't it?

Now, here is the letter with editorial deletions replaced:

Like Kyle Williams (Reader's Forum, July 31), I roll my eyes at the lately fashionable word, "disproportionate." But my disdain arises from the fact that it is too easy to misinterpret, particularly by those prone to black-and-white thinking.

As Williams notes, sending one policeman to apprehend one bank robber would be ridiculously ineffective. A reasonably proportionate response might range from a few officers to a SWAT team.

Given the current and historical facts involved in the Israel-Hezbollah conflict, a proportionate response — using Williams' robbery analogy — might involve a SWAT team. However, if the robber absconds to American Fork, would Salt Lake police be justified in placing all of Utah County under martial law until the criminal is caught?

At bottom, I think my colleague's take on Williams' ridiculous analogy offers a more accurate reflection of what is actually occurring in Lebanon right now. Still, I am always amazed at the DMN editors' readiness to alter their readers' thoughts to suit their own sensibilities.

DS

The Deseret Morning News is not responsible for or associated with this blog. The Deseret Morning News has one-time publishing rights to letters-to-the-editor, after which they are published at various locations on-line. If you have any questions, please e-mail us.

Listed on BlogShares

Last Liberal Blogs Next



Locations of visitors to this page