The Utah Amicus and Systemic Health Care Roots or "Why Can't Republicans Even Pretend not to be Evil?"

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

There was an interesting comment by Jesse Harris over on the Utah Amicus on a short post that Steve Olsen put up. I wound up rewriting my response about 4 times. I started with a flippant one-liner, turned it into a serious one paragraph, then went to a sarcastic two-paragrapher, graduated to a 3 paragraph argument and segued nicely into an obnoxious, barely lucid 4 1/2 paragrapher drenched in sarcasm and evidence of my insomnia. And my friends, when it gets to that point, it's ready to be published on the Deseret Spectacle. So with apologies to my friends at the Utah Amicus, I've moved my response here and quoted the person I was responding to:

Jesse said the following in response to the Utah Amicus post. As he usually does, he made a lucid, reasonable contention, completely undeserving of my bratty reply.
You still failed to indicate how exactly you would bring down the cost of medical care for everyone instead of simply subsidizing its high cost. Failing to address the root cause of insufficient medical care is treating a symptom rather than a cause.
And from that was born this rambling, tangential rant:
Yeah, the health care industry should stay away from treating... symptoms..... Wait. What?

No, that's right. I mean, I can tell you that when *I* get a really bad headache or am experiencing some other kind of intense discomfort, I want a Doctor who leaves me to writhe in pain and pray for my own death. I don't want one of these nut job doctors who devotes time and energy to relieving the immediate, acute symptoms I'm experiencing. That's for short-sighted socialist commies!

What we really need are people who have the intellectual courage and honesty to spend days, weeks, months, years or even decades getting down to the root causes - tracking down those root causes by organizing conferences, creating committees, commissioning reports, reacting to media circuses and movies, wading through the ebb and flow of the different political parties as they come to power and fade away, as well as gripping tight to the economic ups and downs which help muddy the water even further.. And finally, and this is my favorite, getting "unfettered" advice from expert panels riddled beyond salvation by competing money interests, political agendas, and government organizations, defending their turf and the status quo.

After all, I think we can all agree that the primary concern of said interests is cheap, accessible, quality health care where the patients are healthy and happy, and profit margins relative and appropriate.

I'm positive that out of such noble, selfless groups of people will come a clarity of thought and a practical definition of the elusive "root causes" which eventually will help us provide affordable health coverage to each and every one of us. ... some day... maybe not in time to help little Timmy get his toe sewn back on from his lawnmower accident. (Which is really just a symptom of poor lawn-mower-handling skills anyway, so...)

... Right?
Right?

In all seriousness though, I'm very much a fan of making systemic changes and ferreting out systemic problems, but the inescapable reality of the situation is that we have a lot of people who are suffering now.

"No man is an island."

I used to hate that saying.

And truth be told, I still do.

But really, isn't it true? It seems as though when we are pooling together our money to help out the poor or the middle class, Republicans convulse into fits, sputtering accusations like "socialism," "class warfare," and "redistribution of wealth" out of their spittle-laden faces as they cook to a bright red color.

But yet again, we're all getting ready to put whatever our share of another 120 billion dollars to support yet another year of war. We're all throwing in to support a war that the vast majority of us don't approve of, want to end, and that frankly, a war we're all still a little pissed about being duped into. But that? The redistribution of wealth from all of us into the pockets of the military industrial complex? The Halliburton's? The Black water's? The 's? But that? That's just doing our patriotic duty and defending our nation.

I stumbled across a post from some "PR Strategist" or something last night - it was from early in the year, right after the Democrats had taken office. This guy is from Utah, so when I dig up his name, I'm sure some of you will recognized him.

Anyway, he was talking about how they had fulfilled their promise to raise the minimum aThey fulfilled their promised to increase the minimum wage. And what was the headline? "Democrats raise minimum wage!"? "Democrats endanger small businesses by making them pay more for labor!"?

No. To this yahoo, the Democrats raising the minimum wage represented proof positive that the sole aim of the Democratic party is to turn America into a Socialist state.

*Sigh*

Stupidity. So. Much. Stupidity.

The Democrats haven't been immune either, but I'll get to them later. Let's get back to this allergic reaction that Republicans seem to have when faced with the opportunity to be decent human beings and have government do something actually "good."

I mean, don't get me wrong.. I don't think Republicans go out of their way to appear (be?) evil.. But Holy Mother, guys! You really do! Like this latest push for an increase in funding for low-income children.. It comes up again and even our own vapid, bone-headed Senator Hatch is behind it - but you President Bush?

You can't bring yourself to just say "Aw shucks. Why not. Sure, let's throw in an extra 20 or 30 extra million dollars for uninsured poor kids to get medical treatment they need"? You can spend 500 times that on a ludicrous, destined-to-fail military wet dream that your daddy's old, senile boss fantasized about, but ya can't just suck up enough compassion or goodwill to say "Okay, sure, let's help out the poor kids."?

I mean come on guys. You're wiling to pay friggin' FOUR HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS a **DAY** for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but when it comes to paying a fraction of that for years worth of various types of domestic aid you're frugal all the sudden?

*sigh*

Okay. I can see myself getting way off the track here. Let's go back to the original theme of this post..

Causes and conditions. I'm down with exploring, debating and illuminating the roots of the problems we have in our country when it comes to health care. But let's get our friggin' priorities in order and get our people covered while we're figuring it out. We don't have to wait or have a totally solid grasp on what's amiss.

And also, as we do get down to root causes, we can't flinch no matter what; I'm sure there will be things there that I don't like - things that are humbling to acknowledge - but that aside, I think we're going to be going up against roving bands of fire-breathing pharmaceutical lobbyists and grotesquely deformed insurance leviathans, any number of which would happily sacrifice every last one of us if it made them an extra half a percent profit "next" quarter.

Let's shorten the length and power of patents, especially business method patents, on drugs. Let's make the patenting of genes illegal, and make intellectual property protection on adjunct technologies and methods much, much weaker. And don't worry or let them fool you into thinking that they won't do the research if we weaken the intellectual property protection. There are mountains of money to be made in the field, and they're not going to sit on the sidelines pouting because they didn't get an extra government-insured %4000 return on their R&D investments.

If a company or educational institution gets grant money from the government for medical research - make that research public domain - available to every American company and citizen at no cost.

Let's retrieve our collective balls from the trophy shelves of the insurance companies and aggressively take them to task for their unconscionable, yet impressively creative and dramatic interpretations of just how little your insurance coverage actually covers.

There are a lot of things we can do.

The Democrats aren't angels by any means - this last betrayal by them on President Bush's last-minute push for changes to surveillance laws which completely absolved himself and his agents of their blatantly illegal behavior while simultaneously granting them a new system by which even the paltry oversight which did exist has been dismantled - and all of this by a group of Democrats who have railed on against the President and his illegal, warrantless, surveillance? The hypocrisy.. The disappointment.. Well, frankly, it was incredibly demoralizing for me. However, just recently, I regained a tiny sliver of hope, as the Democrats seem to be responding to their constituents, who are pissed and screaming "What the hell are you doing?? Get in there and do the job we elected you to do!!" They have taken actions which suggest they may have realized their screw up, and are going back to review correct it, hopefully long before the current 6-month expiration date nears.

But with the Republicans? I mean.. Good Lord. Over the last six years.. The sheer volume of give-a-ways of public resources; the unprecedented deregulation of dangerous, greedy industries; the sculpting of laws to further provide unaccountable, ultra-wealthy corporations and individuals maximum market protection while simultaneously absolving them of civic responsibility or liability.. All of it is easily ten times worse than my worst fears. There betrayal of the American people has been simply astounding.

As an ideological movement, as a political party, even as a group of men who I can only assume was well-intentioned and honorable at some point.. But all of that is gone now. They have traded away their integrity and principles in their mad, arrogant, self-righteous grappling of power.

They are a party which has lost their soul, and I don't see it returning any time soon. They sold out the people they swore to represent, and I'm just not sure how you recover from that. I'm not sure if you do recover from that. It's really quite tragic, when you think about it.

Okay, I could literally rant for another 30 minutes, but I'm already a little concerned that this post is being driven more by my total lack of sleep last night, so I'm just going to let go. :-) But I'd like to hear any of your opinions on... whatever it was I was talking about.

Actually, if you could tell me what I was talking about, that would be great.

Thanks.

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Worst Threat to America: Al Qaeda or Miss Teen South Carolina?

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

When I started watching this, I thought it was hysterical. By the end of it, I wasn't laughing. And it's not that long a clip.

It got me to thinking: Which is a greater threat to America: Al Qaeda (wiki), or the underlying failures of our education system and shared values that this clip of the South Carolina "Miss Teen USA" (wiki) contestant reflects?





DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , ,

Welcome to the comcastic tiered internet!

Layton, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

Remember the issues DS was having with comcast?

Well other people are noticing that comcast is cutting off whole protocols.

Sunday afternoon I finished setting up a dedicated rtorrent server for seeding Ubuntu .iso images. I do my best to hand out all the CDs I can, but I also figured I could make use of the bandwidth I have to do the same. Once I got on that idea I realized I had access to two Comcast connections (family) where I could drop in two more of these “rtorrent appliances”. So, I got to work setting a second one up and dropped it on the network at my Dad’s house.

Wasn’t I surprised to find that my seeds weren’t taking off. After some quick Google searching I found that Comcast is cutting torrent connections nearly across the board. All across the internet people are complaining about Comcast not letting them seed anymore–and many of these for completely legal material!

I know bittorrent is associated with a lot of pirating. Hell, so was ftp and whatever other protocol you want to drop in here. This doesn’t mean that it is *only* used for pirating. This doesn’t mean that there aren’t legit reasons to use the efficient protocol. Apparently Comcast doesn’t see it this way.

The way I see it this is the first step toward a Tiered Internet, whether or not any such thing is approved in Legislation or by the consumers. Comcast doesn’t care. They are simply cutting off access to part of the Internet, plain and simple.


And it begins...still don't think we need net neutrality? Visit Save The Internet and let your voice be heard!

Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels:

Video - Bill Moyers On Karl Rove

Layton, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

I wrote a small editorial last week about the intersection of Rove with Utah and his legacy for our nation.

Bill Moyers as always takes it to another level in tonights closing commentary on his PBS Journal.

In this excerpt, Moyers applies his unique insight to fellow Texan, Karl Rove:

“Karl Rove figured out a long time ago that the way to take an intellectually incurious draft-averse naughty playboy in a flight jacket with chewing tobacco in his back pocket and make him governor of Texas, was to sell him as God’s anointed in a state where preachers and televangelists outnumber even oil derricks and jack rabbits.”

Watch the video because, once again, Moyers nails it.



HT - News Corpse

Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: ,

Video - Who is John “Bradshaw” Layfield from Bulls and Bears on Fox Noise.

Layton, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

David Sirota posted this clip from Fox Noise "Bulls and Bears" with him discussing the governments role in ending poverty.



I take issue with the basic premise of the question. I don't think that is what anyone is suggesting. But within context of these shows nothing constructive will ever be discussed. I hate these Saturday morning "business" shows because they have nothing to do with business or analysis of the "bulls and bears". How many of these idiots called the latest wall street down turn? I have heard liberal wall street analysts like bonddad talk about the mess we are in right now with bear stearns and runaway credit for going on six months. I have a business degree and I take nothing away from these shows in the way of good business analysis. These show only exist to just feed right wing talking points.

Take note of John “Bradshaw” Layfield and his off the wall comments, he appears at the beginning at 55 seconds and then toward the end at 5:27. Who is John “Bradshaw” Layfield? Well it was pointed out that Mr. Boot Straps was in the WWF (thus the nickname bradshaw) and how did he become known as "North East Securities Senior Vice President" as he is described on these "business" shows? Well Mr. I-worked-my-way-up-by-my-bootstraps married Imperial Bank of Canada executive director Meredith Whitney who is also a Fox Noise contributor and now Bradshaw has decided he is qualified to give investment advice. You mean I have taken more economics classes than Mr. Economics 101 himself. So basically his most important business decision was saying "I DO".

One of things he said that really bothered me is the concept that he pulled himself up by his boot straps, investments from previous generations have helped all of us succeed. They gave us those boot straps and this country didn't magically get this way...and it won't magically stay this way. Investing in public education is the key to ending poverty, spend money on our people, empower them and teach the skills they need to succeed. Republicans have starved public education for years now, they bitch about every dime that goes to public schools and universities. Republicans don't want us to get too smart because then we might figure out how we are being screwed in this country.

In another kicker O'Reilly has comedian Dennis Miller on to discuss something he has no clue about.



This is how Fox noise operates, the only qualifications someone needs to be an "expert" on a subject is being willing to tow the right wing line.

Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , ,

Video - Everything relates back to Harry Potter

Layton, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle





Marshall
Layton, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: ,

Sen. Orrin Hatch: Lone defender of disgraced Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. I'm so proud. (Video)

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

While almost everyone in Washington, even staunch Republican supporters, are jumping the rotting, disgraced, sinking ship of doom which is Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, we here in Utah can once again stand tall and proud as our very own Sen. Orrin Hatch stands up to take up the beleaguered Attorney General's cause.

When you have Arlen Specter, senior Republican, asking the AG "Do you really expect us to believe that?" along with a growing chorus of voices pointing out lies and inconsistencies in the good AG's testimony and public statements, it takes a real man's man to imply that all of that is the result of a "witch hunt" by Democrats.

Either that, or it takes a Senator who is either so delusional that he can't grasp simple facts and situations, or a politician so secure in the fact that he represents a constituency which has fallen to an unholy amalgam of their religion (Mormonism) and Republicanism, so that he knows he can do or say almost anything, and will still be reelected.

And actually, it's not really an either/or sort of deal. I'm sure Sen. Hatch is capable of both remarkable self-delusion and soulless politicking.

In any event, this video is a mash-up of a bunch of statements by various politicians on the matter. It was posted by "Veracifier" (youtube) (from "Talking Points Memo?") and led with this snippet:
TPMtv: Sunday Show Roundup: No Takers

We scoured the Sunday morning talk show landscape for someone, anyone, willing to defend Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. And we came up mighty nigh empty... except for Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT).
Makes ya proud, don't it? Does anybody else wonder why Sen. Hatch never seems to grow older or wiser? I'm getting a little concerned that he has been replaced by a cyborg or something. And let me tell you, Cyborgs aren't down with term limits, and that's really the only way we're ever getting rid of this guy.



DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Democratic Betrayals and Liberal Lunacy - Part 1 of 3

Salt Lake City, Utah - ©2007 - The Deseret Spectacle

First of all, a big thanks to Marshall for rallying together a handful of posts during my extended absence. Life sometimes brings unexpected challenges, and although I've very much missed posting to the Deseret Spectacle as frequently as I have in the past, it has simply been unavoidable. However, as life begins to regain some 'semblance of normalcy, posting on the Deseret Spectacle should as well.

With that out of the way, you may be asking "What's up with the title?" Well, my dear reader, that's a very good question. It's not exactly the tone I wanted to make my return on, but what can I say, it's what's on my mind right at the moment.

Now, don't get me wrong: There are literally dozens of recent incidents revealing yet more high-profile Republican scandals, idiocy, hypocrisy, arrogance, etc. And we'll be getting to them soon. But I just read an article which made me cringe a bit, and as such I thought I'd do a quick post which aims to look at our side of the street a bit so that we might avoid going down the same road that the Republicans did.

There have been a few things which would be worth considering, but here are two cases which I think stand out and that we should all be extremely critical of, and one issue in which we are currently in the thick of, and should be extremely wary of.

I'll be going over each of these in separate posts. This is the first of three.

First up is what I consider to be the first major betrayal by the Democratic Congress of the American people:

In May, the Democratic Congress, pressured by the frighteningly powerful Pharmaceutical lobby, removed a loophole which allowed Americans to import cheaper drugs from Canada and other sources:
Updated: 5:35 p.m. MT May 7, 2007

WASHINGTON - In a triumph for the pharmaceutical industry, the Senate on Monday killed a drive to allow consumers to buy prescription drugs from abroad at a significant savings over domestic prices.

On a 49-40 vote, the Senate required the administration to certify the safety and effectiveness of imported drugs before they can be imported, a requirement that officials have said they cannot meet.

“Well, once again the big drug companies have proved that they are the most powerful and best financed lobby in Washington,” said Sen. David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican.
Perhaps coincidentally, perhaps not, Sen. Vitter was recently outed as one of the "D.C. Madam's" clients. Whatever hypocrisy Sen. Vitter may be guilty of, and he most certainly is, he has been a tireless advocate for allowing Americans to import cheap medication from abroad.

Advocates for closing the loophole include our own Senator Hatch, who has even written op-ed pieces in the Deseret News to convince Utahns how dangerous it is for us to import cheap drugs.

The argument against importing cheap drugs goes something like this:
Sen. Mike Enzi, a Wyoming Republican, said the requirement for a safety certification was essential to protect the public.

“Under both Democratic and Republican administrations, secretaries of Health and Human services have declined to certify that foreign drugs — like those allowed under the Dorgan Foreign Drug Act — are safe for American consumers. They realized, as I do, that close enough isn’t good enough,” Enzi said.
In other words, it's better for our seniors to go without needed medications than risk unsafe medications - a theory which has never been supported by reality. Even more shameful, others have claimed it opens us up to terrorist attacks:
Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., said the proposal was an attempt to push the FDA into reversing itself while "creating a massive hole on our capacity to secure our borders and protect ourselves."

"If I were a creative terrorist, I would say to myself, 'Hey, listen, all I've got to do is produce a can here that says 'Lipitor' on it, make it look like the original Lipitor bottle, which isn't too hard to do, fill it with anthrax," Gregg said.

Lipitor is a cholesterol-lowering drug.
What a terrible lie. If a terrorist wanted to go this route, they would have an almost limitless number of imported products to "fill with anthrax." Indeed, why not choose something like, say, toothpaste?

Not only did the Democratic Congress cave and give the Pharmaceutical industry, which may be the single most powerful, scary lobby in Washington, they did it in the shadow of hypocritical ad campaign criticizing the Bush administration for just this sort of thing:

What started as a trickle of humble bus trips across the Canadian border by senior citizens looking for cheaper medication is picking up national momentum.

Democratic strategists have seized on the issue of importing low-cost prescription drugs and are launching a multimillion-dollar airwave assault on President Bush in 17 presidential election swing states, including Florida and Michigan, where imports are popular.

...

A narrator in its spots, which depict an elderly couple at a kitchen table, says Bush "sided with drug companies, blocking Medicare from negotiating lower prices and banning Americans from importing low-cost drugs from Canada. For President Bush drug company profits come first."
I fully realize that the pharmaceutical lobby is an almost unstoppable juggernaut in American politics. But I cannot and will not excuse them for this. My hopes for the Democrats would be that they would stand up against such forces in spite of their influence.

I have been pleased with the Democrats on other fronts, namely their push for oversight and accountability of a runaway Executive branch, yielding to the drug lobby was a demoralizing slap in the face. I can only hope they endeavor to make it right - and I do have hope, for I think that many in the Congress are fed up being bullied by the Pharmaceutical lobby.

They are our representatives. It seems most members of Congress forget this fact. Our Republican representatives here in Utah most certainly have forgotten this. But just to put this in perspective, take a look at this informal poll on this issue:

While this is not a controlled scientific poll, one would be hard pressed to argue the American people don't want to be able to import medication from abroad.

It is doubly baffling considering how this will anger the "old-people voting block." I've often commented that you can count on this block to do four things: not die, eat, take drugs, and vote. Why would you alienate this group? In a latter post I'll explain some of the methods the Drug industry and Congress are taking to ameliorate this danger.

Also in a later post, I'll be returning to this issue to expand on the corruption and money interests which permeate the Pharmaceutical lobby and their interactions with the Congress. I'll also be including a video of what may be the most poignant television segment "60 Minutes" ever ran.

But next up is a critique of the liberal response to Don Imus' (wiki) foolish and insensitive characterization of Rutgers University female basketball team.

DS
Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret Spectacle is in no way related to the Deseret Morning News.
Letters to the Editor

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Listed on BlogShares

Last Liberal Blogs Next



Locations of visitors to this page